runner,

"You can't seem to get that Islam isn't a race..."

Well yes I do.

"....Most Muslims who don't follow Mohammad are generally noce people."

You've got me a bit confused there, runner.....are you saying that there are "Muslims" who don't testify that Mohammad is the messenger of God?

You know very well that I don't "detest your beliefs" - ie, Christianity. However, I think it's about time you stopped hiding behind that line. You seem to think you can be as spiteful as you like around here - and when someone has a go at you, you pull out the old " You despise my beliefs/Christianity" routine.

Sorry to be the one to break the news, but in your case it's not Christianity people criticise - it's "your" attitude and "your" penchant to paste your opponents with whichever vice pops into your mind when you post.

Btw, just read your last post.....if I want to label it hate-speech, I will, whether it's from you, Belly or a Muslim, a Jew or a Christian or anybody. Any rhetoric that is designed to be divisive and/or to inflame feelings of antipathy in the community, construes as hate-speech.

And why would you paste all Muslims with the Bali and 9/11 atrocities - anymore than you'd blame all Christians for the US slaughtering thousands in Iraq?

.........................................

Hey there, Constance,

Back again with your latest compliment.

Flattery will get you nowhere.

Ho hum.....

Good news!
So far this weekend no one has been shot on the streets of Sydney!
Mal Fraser's Migrants of the 10970,s stayed home.
I want to admit a crime/sin against balanced comments.
I fool that I am read a third of one line in Pauls post.
Here on the net leftys who could not draw a crowd with a pencil or giving away cash, rule!
I n thier own minds.
Just maybe, if we try, we can get back to open debate.
Why do we need these folk, yes SOME are great folk.
But why, in most western country,s is the enclaves they setup, turning to slums?
And beds of future, even present troubles?
What percentage of these folk are on welfare.
How many never leave it?
Horrible thing to say!
Why? if a problem existed with WASPs in that area it would be talked of

But, Belly, "open debate" is what we've been having on this thread.

So what do you mean by "Just maybe if we try, we can get back to some open debate"?

Debate takes place when there are opposing viewpoints.

Of course, your line is that if someone holds a view contrary to yours and then has the temerity to post it, then you are compelled to run off and accuse them of shutting you down.

Or it seems you are suggesting that the only "open debate" you're interested in on this thread is what should be done about Muslim's in Australia and how to stop any more of them coming. I think that's the case - it's just occurred to me that that is the "open debate" that you always anticipated when setting up this thread...well, sorry in that case for intruding.

You forgot to link to the post where on of the "gang of three" abused you because your threads went too long - would be fascinated to read it.

Just thought of something, Belly.

Perhaps next time, in order to shape the sort of "open debate" you envisage, you should perhaps define the proposed parameters of discussion a little more clearly.

In the case of "In My Country", for instance, you could have said something like :..."This thread is for those who agree with me (Belly). We will be debating points of view which reinforce anything I (Belly) post. The discussion/debate is limited to defining the extent of Muslim repugnance and what Australians can do to get that message out there. Anyone who holds a contrary view is not welcome and should be viewed as attempting to shut down "open debate".

I think that should do it : )

"""
you could have said something like :..."This thread is for those who agree with me (Belly).
"""

Hehehe LOL! You only just figured this out, Poirot?

And here I thought your were sharper than that :P~~

It could be like the Silver Bodgie "We have consensus when everyone agrees with ME!"