is this why i cant save pictures
just clicking on picture..or save picture..kills the whole screen

i figure its some program linked to some pornborn virus..designed for us.. to get some better watching mode [for 'them'..watchers..who uploaded with the 'fix'..othewr little clever things

too clever by half
you have to ask what do they get ..out of freaking up our computers...[i got more un.usable computers..than another modern consumable..

im so over playing the freaking games.
a nice thing i heard the other day..is them boxes that turn up in google searches/clicking on them costs them in the box seat..:..money..

they pay to google..i figure google knows our clicks..
so click on those you want to ..'pay'..sort of having two bob each way

have a nice day

Hi, I've been reading the comments and I have a problem. I can't replicate the issues being complained of, even though the complaints are spread widely enough that there must be a problem. I use Chrome normally, but have copies of IE, Safari and Firefox on my computer to perform a basic check on sites.

Thanks for the WC3 checker link Tom. The forum scores badly, probably because it is very old and we haven't had the resources to do anything with it.

I'm thinking of doing some fundraising to find the funds to move all of the site across to WordPress.

Interested in feedback on that.

1.22 AM time all good babies were in bed long ago. I run Safari with windows 7. DSL 2+ and never had a problem.
But seeing the forum is aging a round up of funds sounds like the way to go. I would be happy to forward a hundred $ to help the cause.

Hmmm, I rather prefer this OLO format.
I never have any problems with it, I suspect that it must be your
browser, especially if other ie users are reporting the same problem.

GrahamY, when I experience the intermittent, but occasionally frequent, 'freeze-up' the only consistency is that Firefox 16.0.1 tells me that it is 'waiting for adserver.adtechus.com'

<<Firefox 16.0.1 tells me that it is 'waiting for adserver.adtechus.com'>>

I have that site on my black-list: my internal DNS directs every request to it to a dummy server on my own computer, returning a 1-character page (one line-feed character because some browsers complain if the page is completely empty).

I will never allow to bring this commercialism into my home. If I couldn't prevent it, I wouldn't be here.
Those who allow it should understand that besides the psychological damage, it also takes longer to bring a page, takes space out of the readable area, and you end up paying your ISP for the extra download volume.

Like "579" I am happy to pay for this service, knowing that others too will not have to suffer ads and Graham too will be able to devote more of his time toward the quality of this site rather than courting advertisers.
I don't know whether $100, annual fee I presume, is the right price (seems like Leftists have extra bucks), but I trust Graham will come up with the correct pricing.