do the numbers.1 in 100=1%
if you got 500 kids at your school/workplace/'club'
you got [by the numbers..5 of the 100[not likly ..but were talking strictly numbers right..ONE IN ONE HUNDRED*..

now the more affect you have..the more likely your in the circles where its not 1 in 100..but 10 of the 100..[and yes many of us 1 in one hun are right here...i could name 3 off the top of my head..[you could easilly name 5..if you only stopped and think..who that 1 in a thousand may be..

and to be honest..i found them brilliant funny and well informed
heck their born leaders..get over it...how many ya think are in say media*...[i can think of 20 just there..

or a union or green meeting..theres a few there
even activism..is run by one of them..or onbe trying to earn the numbers to be that one in 100

the bible reliable tells is there are 144,000
really running things*..so even one in 100 is faulse..

sonofgloin,

The truth remains that we all aspire to the self-assured nonchalance of Bugs Bunny.....

.....but most of us end up like Daffy Duck.

Some truth to that my dear Poirot, quack quack quack.

OUG, without looking it up I thought that the 144K had something to do with the number of people that will actually be housed in God’s house, metaphorically. I thought the 144K were saints and good guys, not those who run the world in the end times as described in the book of revelations.

i think it best we dont presume to believe..THEIR WORDS*
judge by their works*..by their works are they revealed*

i met with one of the 'charmed ones'...a kid in his early teens
and his private mentor[for some reason they like no family ties[but thats asuming..anyhow the kid was wise beyond his years..a true leader in the making..

we should retire anyone over 40!
put em on pensions..let the kids fix things

Ah, sonofgloin, how unkind...
In my defense, let me ask, have ever heard of satire?
It has its origins with the ancient Greeks...
Now, as to your comparison between my reference to cartoon characters and Arjay's new world order.
You say that "...at least the new world order that Arjay bleats about does exist", where as the cartoon characters don't.
Well, let's explore that a little, without getting over existentialist about it.
Actually, the cartoon characters do exist. They are a part of popular culture and I could point to a comic book, (if I had one), or a TV show and say to you, "There is a tangible thing to which one might reasonably refer to as one or the other of the cartoon characters."
Thus, on one level - that of popular culture - I can prove that the cartoon characters exist - as cartoon characters.
Now then, can Arjay, or you for that matter, prove that your new world order exists?
I have a military background so I strongly believe in the old military axiom, - when confronted with the choice between a conspiracy or a screw up, bet on a screw up.
Hence I disbelieve all conspiracy theories until hard evidence is provided.
Anyway, you have to admit, the image of Tony Abbott as Roadrunner does raise a smile...
Anthony
http://www.observationpint.com.au
PS With a username that is a reference to a famous fictional character, are you not on shaky ground here? :)

A couple of posts by Arjay.

From Arjay:

“Billy Hughes was another war mongerer who was pushing for the subjugation of Japan back then.The USA forced Japan into war by trade sanctions and trying to cut off their energy supplies. The USA let Pearl harbour happen because their people did not want to go to war.” (BTW it is warmonger not war mongerer.)

The above sounds as though poor Japan was forced into war. Japan had been on a path of aggression in Asia since 1895 when it provoked the Sino-Japanese war. Japan attacked Port Arthur bottling up the Russian Fleet on Feb 8, 1904 then declared war on Feb 10. It was a sneak attack like Pearl Harbor. In 1907 Korea became a Japanese protectorate. During WW1 Japan allied itself with the Allies and took over German interests in Asia. In 1919 Japan suppressed a rebellion in Korea whose people wanted to get free of Japanese domination.

In 1931 Japan invaded Manchuria. That was the beginning of continual war until the Japanese surrender in 1945.

I have had some military experience serving in the US Army and as military advisor to Senator Woodley. As Anthony maintained it is much more reasonable to expect a screw-up than a conspiracy.

The US cut off oil shipments to Japan because those supplies supported aggression. They could have expected the Japanese reaction but didn’t. Since 1926 the Japanese war college had as an exercise an attack on Pearl Harbor. After the attack the admiral and general in charge of Pearl Harbor, Kimmel and Short, were court martialled. They had been derelict in their duties and had not maintained alert. If it was expected the fleet could have been at sea at the time so the damage would have been less.

More Arjay:

“The psychopathic war mongerers are on our side.Their wet dream has been Global domination for centuries and will sacrifice most of our humanity to achieve it.”

Who are these ‘psychopathic war mongerers’ who have had a dream for centuries?

Japan like Nazi Germany was an aggressor which was finally brought down.