Just a thought, Arjay.

What is the connection, in your mind, between the "$35 trillion [that] has been stashed away by the elites in off shore tax havens" and the New World Order?

To help you along, I refer you not to the multiplicity of conspiracy sites that have jumped on the numbers, but to the source document from which they have been derived.

http://www.taxjustice.net/cms/front_content.php?idcatart=2&lang=1

(Incidentally, where did you get your "$35 trillion" from? I can't find any corroboration of that figure. Anywhere.)

Leaving aside the standard Arjay exaggeration factor, there is still nothing to indicate that this is the war-chest of the "New World Order", and absolutely everything to suggest the opposite. It appears to be money in circulation, the only significant factor being that it is being being channelled through tax havens. Immoral, maybe. But legal. And above all, completely visible to the naked eye. The data was gathered from public sources, after all.

You don't have a particularly strong grasp of basic economics Arjay, we all know that very well. But surely, any conspiracy theory needs at least a hint of supporting evidence. All you have here is a bunch of offshore bank accounts.

So please, enlighten me. What is the connect-the-dots here, tax havens and the NWO?

David,
Observation Point is my work. I try to use humour and satire to - more or less - get it out of my system.
Thanks so much for sending the link to your essays.
I spent a pleasant and thought provoking time late this afternoon and this evening reading some of them
I particularly enjoyed God is a Human Invention; matches my thinking closely, but I doubt that I could have laid it out as eloquently as you did.
Cheers,
Anthony
http://www.observationpoint.com.au

One thing you might like to consider, Arjay, is that if a new world order came into being, then some of these wealthy folks are going to have to run it.
Damn, but that would be hard yakka.
Why would they take that job on? it would be utterly thankless, and to no benefit, (to them), as the 1% already have more money than they can spend and probably more power than they can use.
All without the responsibility of having to run the world.
Sorry, but I just can't see an upside for them in a NWO.
Anthony
http://www.observationpoint.com.au

But it must be true, Anthonyve... Because it can't just be coincidence that backwards the initials of the New World Order spell - OWN!

Spooky, eh?

Anthony have your fun but put me in the not so sure basket.
I have zero doubt you and others are far better educated than me, so honestly no barbs,I ask.
Is it true the federal reserve is privately owned.
That it has links to the once privately owned bank of England.
Is it also true, banks in America, can lend, NINE TIMES THE CASH they hold in the bank.
Lending the money that does not exist! out on loan.
And charge interest, who gets the interest?
ANY TRUTH, that 300 years ago a single family took control of banking in England Europe And then America?

Anthony>>One of my favourite pastimes is to imagine which cartoon characters various politicians most remind me of.<<

Belly the above statement is the first line of Anthony’s current blog on Observationpoint. Whether Anthony is educated or not, his favourite pastimes leaves me wondering how well researched our Anthony is and how sound his prognostications are.

It is obvious he is cartoon literate, but is he nonfiction literate, is Anthony reality literate? He obviously knows a bit about Pepe Le Pew, Penelope Pussycat, Droopy the Dog and the Road Runner but has he researched the pedigree of the banks that make up the US Fed reserve, or our own carbon copy, the Aussie Fed, which is in place to regulate a fiscal policy agenda in line with the direction and decree that comes from the European banksters and the IMF. They are the same entity in reality, but seeing the banksters insists on the non de plume of the IMF I have always defined them separately. But for Anthony’s sake I will couch their relationship in the terms of his favorite pastime.
“The European banksters are like the Flintstones Anthony, they are one and the same, but we call them Fred and Wilma.”

I would suggest that Arjay has an infinitely stronger grasp on reality than Anthony or the effervescent David, simply because the organizations and connections that Arjay bleats on about do exist in reality.