The Forum > General Discussion > Does Julia deserve to survive?
Does Julia deserve to survive?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Page 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- ...
- 33
- 34
- 35
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
I've found it amusing to see Labor members pointing out how unsuited Tony Abbott is for the PM's job given their history of choice of leaders.
Just looking at a few recent ones
- Hawke, from what I've read a serial cheat on his marriage
- Keating, sets the standard and arrogant and the devisive politics apparently so hated by Labor supporters.
- Beasley, seemed to be a decent guy but unelectable over a long period.
- Latham, we dodged a bullet.
- Rudd, reportedly described by one collegue as a psycopath. At best very difficult to work with and two faced.
- Gillard, seemingly no problems at all with habitual lying. Even what's been admitted in the last couple of days shows how many lies were told when Rudd was deposed.
I don't know enough about Crean but my impression is of a bully given to misuse of power. Less than favorable recollections of Whitlam and Hayden (although Hayden seemed to do a good job as GG).
Perhaps Abbott does lack what he needs to be a good PM, I'm not a big fan but given Labors track record in picking leaders I think I'll treate their recomendations on that front with the respect they deserve.
R0bert