Banjo, your thought pattern is proof.
It supports my concerns.
IT IS WRONG always.
News International, is wrong,quite wrong.
If it was owned by the ALP or Australian conservatives it would be wrong.
I ask you this mate, if you or I owned it we would, tell me, use it to push our wishes, now we would yes?
But is it ok to do things so criminal, as this mob have done.
Are you and I playing Euka? is that all there is, you throw the left bower On my ace.
Or is the proposed crime, of one journal.
Enought to get NI of the hook.
Public life demands truth NI is muddying the waters, to slip away in the cloudy mud.

In this mobile phone hacking case, actually it is not hacking as they
used a facility provided by the mobile phone company, no one thinks
to put any blame on the mobile phone company.

They could have prevented the eavesdropping by simply not allowing
two phones with the same number on the network at the same time.

Bazz the practice how ever is/was quite illegal.
The results the same,.
And you above all will know of my advice re privacy in the home.
The use of any tool to criminally invade the privacy of any one should be a concern.
Multi millions of dollars, paid so far, speak of that.

Belly, I never said that it let the reporters off the hook.
What I said was that the phone company has some responsibility in the
matter because they provided the facility that was used to access
other peoples message bank. It was deliberately designed in.

I have just been for a surf in the waters of the British press.
Part of this subject is getting much more exposure there.
It seems the inquiry will almost for sure set new boundary's and see some go prison.
The Australian NI ,and for that matter most of our papers, are facing?
Well just what are they facing and us too.
I like a lot of others,remote livers for sure, read my news online.
But it has always been advertising ,not the cost of the paper that paid the bills.
It no longer is.
NI leads, in biggest loss, but our media can not survive without change.
ABC TV in back ground.
And it played take outs from our nations shock jocks .
I can not but ask,did I truly hear that?
The hatred against Gillard, defamation and hate.
Look I want her gone, but this was infamous.
Very, very, hard but can we put our biases away and ask what is the roll of the media.
Are the likes of Alan Jones free to say these things?
I have a good voice, anyone want an ALP biased shock jock, promise to slander a lot, draw a crowd may even get a lynching under way.

Let's face it, discussing the fate of the mainstream press here is like the fleas discussing what's to be done with the dog.