The Forum > General Discussion > Australian Media Inquiry.
Australian Media Inquiry.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Page 8
-
- All
Posted by Belly, Sunday, 27 November 2011 4:29:52 AM
| |
We of the Nation of she will be right mate seem uninterested in the inquiry under way in Britain.
Daily story's some if true pure criminal actions go unremarked about. A thought pattern seems to block our considered thoughts,its those Labor/Greens it will go away. A strange view a singer is offered $100.000 or a we will give you a favor offer. We complain about our ex Polly's getting to spend thousands, but ignore the papers we buy fund a special form of crime. I have little doubt a new tsunami will change forever our news the way we get it. Australia, a much smaller country,will not bite the hand that may scratch or cane it, both sides content to be cowards. But are we, Joe and Jane average unconcerned,well maybe not if it was us. Posted by Belly, Tuesday, 29 November 2011 4:20:32 PM
| |
I am disturbed about a story in todays papers.
It talks of a former MLC from Tasmania. His crime and walking away from it shows our law is indeed deaf blind and very dumb. But why are we not told what party he represented, grubs and slugs from my side of the fence both dead and alive are named. What is going on. Posted by Belly, Wednesday, 30 November 2011 3:55:34 PM
| |
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/nov/30/leveson-inquiry-dowler-phone-hacking
While I am talking to myself this will not go away. A serving police officer 30 years service breaks the rules to talk about his evidence of criminal acts not being acted on. OUT OF FEAR, at the power of the press. Not a Greens issue, Not a Labor one. This criminal behavior can be shown to both favor then constructively oppose both sides of politics. Power of the press,, not unlike the power of some Criminal groups fear provides power. Our silence maintains it. Posted by Belly, Thursday, 1 December 2011 4:37:19 PM
|
Nehru is in grave doubt.
Can it be used without the passage of Labors bill?
As we both understand maybe/probably no.
The advice given, by the same people who advised Howard is no.
And we both understand the court of silly walks and silly law givers twisters, would see a flood of horse hair wig adorned rabbits challenge it, maybe likely win again.
I think Gillard has failed here.
If she had guts, if she had ever had an original thought, she would announce this.
As the coalition would not pass the bill.
She will rebuild Nehru, a multi million dollar cost, it is not ready to inhabit.
And send the boats there.
That failure would rest on Abbott, but as a cost saving measure she will re introduce the bill first.
It would put Abbott out to dry.
As both of us know, he would in government put a bill not unlike Gillards before the house.
We are not amused by the failure to pass truth on the way to scoring points against Labor.
But amused to see Abbott's rope has little left on its roll.