The Forum > General Discussion > Playing the man, not the ball.
Playing the man, not the ball.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
The AWB in my opinion was just another intimate gentlemen's club where the code of ethical business conduct and adherence to the financial and trade sanctions was the last thing on their minds. The saga is now another shameful part of history where the federal government failed to take action. And wasn't Mr Flugge the gentleman employed for a $1 million to stamp out corruption in Iraq?
The masses may be forgiven once for allowing themselves to be duped. When corruption in governments occurs a second time with the same players, then we, the masses, are indeed an ill-informed lot.
The tentacles of Burke and Grill in WA have not only permeated every industry type in WA including commercial and industrial property development, the hazardous waste industry and mining to name a few but their connections are now having ramifications for federal politicians whose protests are a repeat of the "school boys" protests we've recently had in WA - "Wasn't me Miss - I didn't do it!"
These industry lobbyists have again been permitted to arrogantly strut our corridors of parliament, dangling carrots and colluding with ministers for personal gain.
During the WA Inc. days, Mr Burke's brother, Terry was paid a "commission" of $600,000; his secretary a fee of $55,000 for "special consultations" and Mr Burke kept $100,000 in cash,in his office for "stamp" costs. That whole sorry saga saw the WA taxpayers cough up $30 million including legal costs for Mr Burke and his deputy premier.
And here we are in 2007, same government, same players offering personal bribes and rewards to ministers and bureaucrats, now resulting in the taxpayers having to again meet the costs of the Corruption and Crime Commission's investigations.
Sure, there is nothing outwardly unlawful for ministers to lunch with members of any fraternity which begs the question: "Why are these meetings conducted in a covert fashion and not officially documented by ministers and bureaucrats and why aren't community groups afforded the same privileges?"
Just appearing respectable is no longer a guarantee of honesty.