The Forum > General Discussion > No one police's rights
No one police's rights
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Page 6
- 7
- 8
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
I'm sure Belly would know as you say Rehctub, but I myself have intimate knowledge on this subject. I did approach Workchoices at the time, through my local member about unpaid work hours. Their reply in writing explained that the work practices I described were illegal and it was my right to pursue them. At my cost.
Previously I could have approached the Union relevant to my industry and Arbitration would have sorted these matters for free. The onus is upon myself to produce the evidence and to some extent always was in a totally non- union workplace. Every pay slip I have ever received in the car trade, says I have worked 38 hrs, even though I have worked approx 56 hrs. How can I supply evidence.
I must stress that these long hrs are because of the operating hours of the business, our contractual obligations, not because of customers.
Motor trade contracts institutionalise 16 -20 unpaid work hours per week.
In fact most of the time is spent waiting or searching for customers.
I do agree that the small business era is over. We see evidence of this with major corporates taking over the Retail sector, pricing competition out of the market. Another piece of evidence of the damage done to trade practice and consumer protection laws.
It is your corporate overlord that will decide the fate of your small business Rehctub, not the amount of money you spend preserving the living standards of your employees.
The work practices I describe above are illegal even now, but no one in Gov't will make them stop doing it.
You could be worse off than this and be employed on a casual basis, have no holiday or sick leave, penalty rates or job security, or be a guest worker on an offshore oil rig , painting for $3 an hour, while your corporate employer claims to not be the one employing you and therefore not breaking any laws. (Although there has been legal action about this one).
The balance is not right now.