just as the gas was caused by greed
just as power is increasing to buy day time [not of peak] power for double what normal tarrif is [ie the feed in greed sceme]

where you get highly discounted solar cells..for near nothing
and they buy your daytime power for 44 cents a kiloWHAT?

while putting their full power on off peak supply
at arround 12 cents..and we muggins paying 22 cents are paying for it all

as power goes up..were told that is for infastructure..lol
yes giving those in on the scam ..extra cash [via feed-in tarrif and free solar cells]..as well as building pipe lines to link up those 40,000 leakey gas wells destroying the artesian basin

aint you too clever by half anna blight
this on top of cancelling your insurance...

[and not putting the prenium away for ther rainy day]
now a new tax we shall HAVE to pay

[while we got compulsory vehicle insurances
we need to pay or go to jail]

bonmot:>> Unfortunately, it says more about the people (not unlike yourself, Hasbeen) than that of the science ... which still has to be done.<<

Well bonmot, the science has already been done by Climate Change Professors with the aid of billions of dollars from the first worlds pockets, and the decision came in 2009.....They had to lie and manipulate the numbers to get a result they wanted, but they did it, and got caught. Since that was exposed as a filthy self serving lie not much else from them except the Goresque "the sky is falling" rhetoric, and whinging that the US will no longer fund Carbon Climate Change bullsheiser.

Sonofaloin: The sky is not falling. However, the consequences of the changing climate, small that it might seem now, will be bad enough.

It is important that measures are taken to adapt to the changes that lie ahead, and it is important that we wean ourselves off fossil fuels. This will take decades.

You don’t have to believe in AGW to do this, you don’t even have to understand the science (you obviously don't).

Nevertheless, if you understand anything about US legislature, you would understand that while the House has said it doesn’t want to donate (a relatively minor budgetary amount) to the funding of the IPCC, it still has to pass the Senate, controlled by the Democrats.

Regardless sonofaloin, it is obvious in this so called 'debate' that political, religious and socio-cultural ideology trumps science. No matter how many inquiries are had, and regardless of all the outcomes – you will believe what you want to believe – science fact won’t change your mind (this is also obvious).

Answer me this sonofaloin, do you think climate science funding should be cut, as the US Republicans and Tea Party want?

bonmot:>> Answer me this sonofaloin, do you think climate science funding should be cut, as the US Republicans and Tea Party want?<<

Answer me this Jim me lad, would you have the same teams of gravy train professors doing the research?

Careful there bonmot!

Those who hang on to the con for too long, hoping to resurrect the thing, are likely to be left holding the bag.

For some the only job left will be sweeping the streets. You should get out before it's too late.

Bonmot good morning, do not be trapped here your views, ones I share will not be heard here.
Worth noting the self confidence, on both sides, is showing.
And worth understanding one side is totally wrong.
I am prepared to be judged, even prepared to be proven wrong, and confident that will not happen.
Such threads are best avoided.
No intention to debate, roll the issue about , find pros and cons exist.
We would best serve our beliefs by not continuing to give reason to further insult the great number of us who hold opinions not shared here.
My last post in this thread,go ahead and insult me however I will read and chuckle over it till it dies.