This site is chock full of one eyed whingers. How about saying something constructive. Politics is not a football match.
With the election going 50 50 i would say all promises are off, no one voted for any promise.

"Any mother that leaves two kids alone for that period of time wants stoning, or worse if thats possible. 5+6 is to young to be left alone for a period of time."

Constructive eh 579?

Next time you post try not to be an arrogant contradiction.

It would be nice to see this thread progress into a civilised factually based 'debate' if you will.
Personally I know little of politics and I would like to read the word of the people so to speak, so long as that word isn't completely opinion based.
I'm not criticising before anyone feels the need to make that the focus point of my post

579 original thought, ever had one? do you understand your view is not the only one?
And in truth your way of telling us leaves me baffled who do you talk about?
Now SM admirable use of the thimble and pea trick.
Before you indulge us with the home brewed medicine lets review the facts.
Abbott/Gillard both made promises they could not keep given the out come of the election.
Painful hard to let go of your determination to use feathers as throwing sticks but true.
No one,except the greens is happy with the election out come.
Labor may suffer most, because more people truly dislike the greens than support them.
We however had a very real chance that Abbott could have been juggling these eggs.
You then, as a one sided totally biased conservative would be selling me snake oil, well in fact are, here.
No fool you know its not working but have fun.

Belly,

There is a world of difference through not meeting one's promises through an inability to do so, and actively setting out to do exactly the opposite of what she promised.

With 145 of the 150 seats elected on the promise of No carbon tax, to say that there is a mandate for no carbon tax is an understatement.

The precondition that members of the climate committee accept that there will be a carbon price means that TA cannot appoint anyone without breaking his promise to the electorate.

I doubt that this subtlety is lost on the electorate either.

I find yet again Shadow Minister not one word or idea in your post I agree with.
I feel very confident you do not think like that but farm the confrontation at any price you spoke of in a thread titled confrontation.
I however like her choice to get rid of the proposed love in on the subject bad idea that.
As our PM I cede to her the right to always change her mind, to go for good policy over bad.
Gentle men understand it is indeed a womans right to change her mind

Touche!