The Forum > General Discussion > The real Julia Gillard
The real Julia Gillard
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Page 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
-
- All
Posted by Houellebecq, Thursday, 5 August 2010 2:48:31 PM
| |
Dear Houellie,
From your previous post. I simply took a page out of your book. If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with BS! Posted by Foxy, Thursday, 5 August 2010 4:14:10 PM
| |
So do we now have the 'fake' Kevin Rudd, or the 'real one'.
Remember, the real one got the chop! Or was that the 'fake' one? I'm confussed! I really think JG and the labor party have lost the plot and they should be counting thier lucky stars that the libs don't have a leader in the likes of John Howard or Peter Costello, as it would simply be 'game over'! As I say, labor are odds on to loose the un-loosable. Posted by rehctub, Friday, 6 August 2010 6:54:21 AM
| |
Dear rehctub,
What's so winnable about the Libs? They're trying to win on "More slogans, less ideas!" And who but the numb nuts are going to buy into that. Do you really know what Tony Abbott stands for? He's said so many things in the past and now he's done an about face on all of them. Who's the real Tony Abbott? And as for John Howard's legacy? Please... Racist with dignity! http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=10661 Posted by Foxy, Saturday, 7 August 2010 11:10:07 AM
| |
Foxy,
Well said in context of current thread. Personally, I wonder at the 'numb nuts' mentality to not being able to recognise that the "real JG" was in a both a metaphorical sense and a declaration to be straight forward (i.e. more simplistic). I think it is a indictment of Australian society that a significant number numb nut either use this prefabricated banal argument to avoid real discussion on substance. These same numb nuts are lead by the media who thrive on sensation and extremes are saying this is a dull election , devoid of differences. The notion is preposterous, an excuse to avoid actual effort. And they call themselves patriots... what a joke. Self-centred, lazy probably, but true blue Aussies good grief Posted by examinator, Saturday, 7 August 2010 2:12:34 PM
| |
Dear Examinator,
It is rather disheartening, especially when I read the local newspapers. I can't believe that the issue of the "boat people," has become an election issue. In 2000-01, several conservative politicians used the issue of the "boat people" (many of whom are Muslim) to advance their political fortune. This issue was widely debated and discussed, and the Federal Government, sensing the unease within the Australian community about "boat people" and "asylum seekers," followed a hardline policy. This, despite the fact that the refugee problem Australia faces is very small compared with that of other developed countries. According to statistics issued by the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (DIMA) the total number of people arriving in Australia was negligible. Yet in the rhetoric over the "boat people", they were demonised as "queue jumpers" (there is no queue) or as potential terrorists, and in the most bizarre case were even accused of throwing their children into the sea (children overboard - scandal - which turned out to be a lie). The fuelling of hatred against these boat people continues even today and is believed in certain sections of the Australian community. And, that's only one issue that troubles me. The others are - the Liberals are using this campaign to prey on people's fears and to redeem the name of John Howard's legacy and the "injustice" perpetrated upon him at the last election. Nothing will help us all if these people get elected. Even the prominent former Liberal Prime Minister, Malcolm Fraser, has made it quite clear that the current Liberal Party, if elected would be a major disaster for the nation. Do we want a George W. Bush clone, who follows the dictates of the Vatican, to be PM of this country? Posted by Foxy, Saturday, 7 August 2010 4:45:12 PM
|
How did you get that? I'm intrigued.