The Forum > General Discussion > Missing link? What evidence would sway creationists?
Missing link? What evidence would sway creationists?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- ...
- 15
- 16
- 17
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
You have presented no evidence that the unseen Creator designed the principles of matter and its behaviour. Obviously you believe the Dawkins delusion, who is neither a leading phycologist or serious science researcher, but an emotive evangelist for atheism - the sad bitter little man. In an interview done by Bern Stein with Dawkins in the film "Expelled" [though I think the film had too much emotive material] he almost concluded that there were some intelligent design that was not a result of natural selection i.e. a god force.
I do not agree with much that fundamentalist creationists hold too and have been denied from the Creation site. However it has not determined that because of their emotive views and action that I will now become an atheist. It is more that they will not accept any term that remotely involves a progression of species and blatently dismiss the whole theory. Many of them will not recognise God designed and used observeable natural forces. Such is the case on the subject of organic decay and death being a created design which I uphold from the same Biblical text they read