The Forum > General Discussion > Evolution is not a scientific theory
Evolution is not a scientific theory
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Page 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- ...
- 29
- 30
- 31
-
- All
? All?
Posted by West, Wednesday, 24 January 2007 7:30:17 PM
| |
You should have noticed it by now West. Like ants to sugar, moths to flame or flies to @#*%, this topic sure does pull 'em.
Posted by Bugsy, Wednesday, 24 January 2007 9:23:45 PM
| |
I appeal to those who believe there is a higher intelligence beyond the frailty of the human mind, that the human mind discovers by the use of consistent deduction and logic inherrent within the nature of the universe the reality of design. Human intelligence is a product of the higher intelligence and design; and human intelligence is a reflection of the wisdom of the Creator. The fact that intelligence exists in the human mind, is evidence of the presence of intelligence in the universe. Unless of course you deny intelligence or design are realities - then it is pointless trying to prove such.
Posted by Philo, Thursday, 25 January 2007 1:37:44 PM
| |
You cannot prove something to exist that does not exist. That is only part of the point. The point is god is based on zero information - no proof of god, the believer elaborates great amounts of information based on nothing. Everything is claimed from what an alleged god thinks - who and why he loves and who and why he smites to magically designing and creating 'stuff'. From this we get everything from Islamic terrorism to churches protecting child abusing priests , all condoned by god except where god disagrees depending on the loyalties of the believer. God is one confused puppy , on a theological level too confused to be intelligent about anything. The bottom line is if there is no proof of god in the first place everything that follows from god is made up by the believer.
Posted by West, Thursday, 25 January 2007 1:57:42 PM
| |
That's right.
Philo, in short: human intelligence is not a gift of a creator; it's the result of evolution. Scientists have evidence about the development of intelligence by comparing artifacts from different timezones. If Adam and Eve were created ready-made with a higher IQ then we have today, how come that scientists have found a collection of artifacts ranging from very primitive to more advanced artifacts? Philo I am not writing this to criticise you, but I am interested in a (logical) explanation of this. If you are saying that human beings such as Adam and Eve as God created them were perfect and highly intelligent and that humans are only evolving 'backwards' because they lose strength of genes or of DNA, then how come that Adam or Eve (since they had about 900 years to figure it out) didn't create anything worthwhile such as say, Bill Gates or Graham Bell did? Although intelligence is not unique to humans, we have a so-called ‘critical mass’ of neurons necessary for the development of language. Because of that critical mass of neurons we developed language humans’ and because of language, human intelligence took an evolutionary leap forward not seen in other animals Posted by Celivia, Thursday, 25 January 2007 6:48:47 PM
| |
Umm, How about a musical trip down memory lane then;
I found it West; “Erik Von Daniken” Need a Real player though. http://www.weirdsville.com/chariotsgods.ram Not happy Bugsy, you could have been a little more original, but now I must refer to your Eyes bleeding; That would be a symptom of The Coalesce Virus; Rabbit. Posted by All-, Thursday, 25 January 2007 7:00:10 PM
|