The Forum > General Discussion > Without fear of consequence
Without fear of consequence
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Page 7
- 8
- 9
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
>>There is a few on here that would like to see it gone. 'Fables' was brought up already.<<
It is predominantly a reflex action. When the religious folk posting here quote from their scripture in order to justify their stance on an issue, atheists tend to react by suggesting that they are relying upon a bunch of stories, as opposed to strictly factual occurrences.
Hence "fables".
To understand this, you need to recognize that to an atheist, the Bible is as reliable a source, on issues of fact, as the Harry Potter stories. They will, generally speaking, accept that the parables and morality tales are more or less appropriate for human consumption. But again, in much the same way as we can "learn" from the trials and tribulations of a fictitious child wizard.
I don't think it's necessarily fair to say that this indicates a general desire to see the end of religion.
>>The way I see it is that it would happen two ways. One way would be by force, by making worship illegal and punishing people for worshipping.<<
That is exactly how I see it NOT happening. Trying to deny someone else the right to believe what they believe, by force, is like trying to put out a fire by throwing gasolene on it.
If we haven't learned that by now. then I suspect we never will. We are surrounded by recent, vivid examples, mostly in the animosity between Christianity and Islam, that underline the reality that religious beliefs will never be eliminated by coercion of any kind.
>>The second would be by choice. Some event or understanding that makes people let faith go.<<
Agreed. But I strongly believe that will be a personal choice, and not a collective one.
>>What's an Atheist called if religion doesn't exist?. Just curious.<<
"Atheist" will simply become a historical term, along with "Christian", "Muslim", "Hindu" etc.
Much as we don't refer to people as "serfs" any longer. It no longer refers to feudalism, instead is used figuratively, rather than literally.