<<Shouldn't you be practicing - what is being preached? >>
That would be a first.

Thanks runner for proving the soundness of the final comments in my last post. Here was me thinking maybe I was a bit harsh.

Foxy
Murdering the unborn is hardly "Love thy neighbour...". It really is barbaric.

Maybe I am wrong STG if I am forgive me.
Your posts on this subject while very much more anchored to reality than say runners are heated, barbed, warlike to those who do not believe.
You must not take away a persons goodness because they do not believe in fables.
runner, yet again I find you strange, like others here you hide behind God, yet if he/she existed I have no doubt you would be first in the fire.

Right-to-Life is really just Right-To-Birth because once they are born they are qualified to be treated the same way as everybody else, whether bombed, starved or stuffed into Gas Ovens - by all those God-Fearing nations throughout history.

The other difference is that those who promote it suffer no consequences of their own either way, but they do get to feel better about themselves.

I actually explained what I meant as clear as I can there Belly, if you STILL can't comprehend that that was NOT what I was saying then the fault lays squarely in your own head.

I. Am. Not. Saying. People. Without. Faith. Are. Fundamentally. Bad.

FK me man, want me to draw you pictures or what?. My questions related to religion and the religious, my intention had ZERO to do with Atheism excluding their wish to rid the world of religion.

WOULD THERE BE A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON SOCIETY IF RELIGION WAS ABOLISHED?.

As for fables, science doesn't even know how lightening works, archaeology is guess work where no one in the field agrees with each other and Darwinism is only decades old. Please, get some points on the board before you start condemning and vilifying others.

Dear runner,

It isn't up to you to judge.

"Judge not, lest thee be judged..."

"He who's without sin throw the first stone..."

et cetera...