If what this poor farmer (Peter Spencer) is saying is true, then this government is totally sinister and corrupt. If true, how can we help this poor guy?

listen to Alan Jones interview with this poor soul.
http://www.2gb.com/podcasts/alanjones/alanjonespeterspencer081209.mp3
http://www.2gb.com/podcasts/alanjones/alanjonespeterspencer111209.mp3

And here an article on the ABC's rural pages which has another sound clip to listen to.
http://www.abc.net.au/rural/wa/content/2009/12/s2771546.htm
http://mpegmedia.abc.net.au/rural/wa/countryhour/click_here_m1827358.mp3

Great topic.Here we see the hypocracy of govt.We are increasing coal exports,we have desalination plants that gobble coal and the farmer gets punished.So Kevin is going to create more CO2 and tax us more for using it.Are the electorate that stupid?

Here is where we really see the power of the corporates.They want to mine more coal,gas and oil.put a tax on it and trade carbon credit on the stock market.So in effect that get a higher price for their pollution and they can make more profits on the share market trading carbon credits.

The effect will be to send farmers broke and the corporates will buy properties for virtually nothing then with their donations to political parties,change the rules to suit themselves.This is modern day serfdom and we'd better wake up soon.

Great topic?
Truly no offense meant but find myself posting after 2 posts that clearly come from a fantasy, that seem based only on that.
No sarcasm, but is raw mustard Mr Minchin?
And if our farmer was a coal protesting conservationist would RW be as concerned?
Arjay, long ago your slide into an unreal world lost me, but surely we all know no government action was ever likely as a result of this poorly advised hunger strike.
Can any of us not know if governments give in to such acts they will grow?

Everything Peter Spencer is saying is true. I know because I have known him for the last four years, and have followed his progress through the courts. He is asking that Christianity and the principles of the Holy Bible be restored to all Australians, and if he dies, his reward will be in heaven. The hardest man to kill is one who does not fear death. Even if his body perishes, his ideas will not.
The evidence of the replacement of Christianity in Australia by communism and fascism, is undeniable. By clicking on this website, anyone can obtain a copy of the evidence, courtesy of an Air Express bag. www.community-law.info
It often takes a martyr to effect real change and wake up a population to the gross injustice of a government. Most of us do not get called to give up our life for a cause. If called most of us will not respond, but Peter Spencer has heard a call, a call to end injustice, and has answered the call of His God, and until His God is again given respect in the courts of Australia, he will stay up his pole.
If Peter Spencer is martyred, Kevin Rudd will be a Scullin, a one term wonder. Tony Abbot is already moving to make the Christian majority his own. Unlike Fullabull, he is not shy about his Christian faith. Fullabull showed his true colors, after one vote changed history, and like Kevin Rudd, a committed Christian started to lead the Liberal National coalition. Australia cannot be governed except with the common consent of all Christians.
In Ireland the Roman Catholic Church was filled to the rafters, every Sunday when it was the national protest organization against injustice. Since 1922 its influence has declined, as it has no enemy outside to fight.
If Peter Spencer is allowed to die, it will unite Australian Christians as never before, and the flaws in government he has exposed, will be repaired and Churches will all be like Hillsong Church and filled to capacity. To borrow a phrase from the seventies, Its Time

So Belly,you see no injustice or hypocracy here.Just tow the Rudd line because your party can do no wrong? Kevin Rudd knew this was wrong that's why we didn't know about.Shame on the corporate media also.

This is a law in force in Australia but no longer applied. Peter Spencer is the victim of flawed lawmaking.
The Process of making law in Australia is flawed, and will remain flawed unless and until the legal profession confines itself to executing the law instead of making it by legal interpretation. The proper and lawful way that a Law is made is a three part process by reference to freely available documents. They are:
(1) The passage of a Bill through both Houses of Parliament and its submission to a Vice Regal person, for the royal assent.

(2) The giving of Royal Assent by either the Governor General or a delegate of Her Majesty Elizabeth the Second, by Royal Sign Manual.

(3) The Enrolment of the assented Bill in the Supreme Court in accordance with S 22 Australian Courts Act 1828 for when it is enrolled it becomes a universally binding Deed, to which every person is bound, knowing that it complies with all the provisions of the Australian Constitution because the Supreme Court has a duty, under S 15A Acts Interpretation Act 1901 ( Cth) to ensure all Acts are made within the Constitution.

All valid laws should have a Royal Identifier on them, and all valid delegates of Her Majesty Elizabeth the Second should have a Royal Identifier to be affixed by them on documents they have approved. The Australian Constitution as published in England has a Royal Identifier on it, but it is omitted here in Australia so Judges and Magistrates feel free to ignore it or apply it at their whim.

They no longer have a Personal Royal Identifier, or Seal, to affix to their judgments. None of the judgments Peter Spencer is protesting, is issued under a Royal Identifier. A protester on Peter Spencer’s mountain, called all politicians dishonest prostitutes, saying a prostitute earns her money, but politicians are not at present doing so.

She was angered by Kevin Humphreys who was also present, who said the millionaire property developers at Bringelly, were able to buy whatever decisions they wanted from the NSW Government