and of course the shootings had nothing to do with Islam. The fact that he attended the same mosque as Bin Laden means well drr

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/6521758/Fort-Hood-shooting-Texas-army-killer-linked-to-September-11-terrorists.html

The Islamic apologist are looking more silly and ignorant as the days go on. The best they can do is try and lump every person's religion except their own in the same boat. It seems that the only reason this guy was allowed to get to this stage was because other soldiers were afraid of being accused of racism (what a familiar tale created by the leftist lunies who live on another planet). Unfortunately just like Mr Rudd's immigration debacle innocent lives are being lost due to this pc madness.

Dear Suze,

without going back to read again, but from memory, all I can say is that the tongue-in-cheek had me fooled, and I didn't quite get it, eh?

Still, I agree completely with your good sense in how peace can only be achieved in this world when our grandparents and grandchildren can all work together and make sense of this mess we have been left with and leave to them as a legacy, and that includes politics and religion and treatment of different genders and economics and even the price of eggs and the hormones fed to battery chickens before they get barbecued, but all told, we don't have the chance of a potted aspidistra in hell if we can't work together as the most essential team in the perseverance of human life on this miserable little planet.

I will try to remember in future if I disagree with some of your opinions that first of all we are on the same team, we're mates, and maybe sometimes I'm a little slow in getting gist of the humour.

Thanks for your reply Suze. Goodnight and sweet dreams to all.

CJ Morgan,
“I think that Muslims would only constitute a small minority of the perpetrators of this kind of crime.”
Do you mean the kind of crime where someone screams Allahu Akbar as they’re flying jetliners into buildings, beheading hostages on the internet, shooting unarmed infidel soldiers, blowing themselves up in crowded markets, etc?
I would have thought that Muslims would be responsible for a large majority of this kind of crime.
I’ll have to start burying my head in the sand more.

Seano the perpetrator was paralysed reportedly by a woman's bullet
a defining moment of the whole sorry episode.
women and men have equal opportunity to be elected to men's legislatures
where everybody remains under male supervision.
HermanYutic, thank you for reminding everybody men do terrible things.
CJ Morgan thank you for having the courage to acknowledge responsibility.

I see this topic has brought out the handful of loonies that seem to inhabit this site. This time they don't seem to have the intellectual capacity to differentiate between the millions of worshipers worldwide who lead peaceful lives and the loony terrorists and the mentally disturbed who practice violence in God's name ......... just like the Christian fundamentalists used to regularly do in days gone by ( and occasionally do today ... see my prevoius list).

My point is, the VAST majority of Christians and Muslims around the world live peacefully.

But of course the loonies here are happy to grab at any chance to misrepresent an entire religion ...... just look at the rubbish runner writes on this topic. Interesting to note he was 100% incapable of addressing my challenge to him. It seems to me, runner is everything Jesus Christ was NOT.

"Seano the perpetrator was paralysed reportedly by a woman's bullet
a defining moment of the whole sorry episode.
women and men have equal opportunity to be elected to men's legislatures
where everybody remains under male supervision."
Posted by whistler, Monday, 9 November 2009 12:07:09 AM

Whistler, there is no such thing as woman's bullet, nor a man's bullet. Bullets are bullets, and guns are guns - so easy to use that even sheilas can pull a trigger. I don't suppose the fact that the madman was a trained psycho has the sensational value his faith and gender can provoke.

As for your off-topic comment in the second sentence, firstly you're dreaming and secondly why don't you start a new thread on this bee in your bonnet about division of women and men into two separate societies?

As I mentioned the first time I read your similar post, I would be very pleased to know that all the taxation I have paid over the last 25 years would not have to pay for the health care, student/research funding, government salaries, pensions and child allowances of women, because I'd guess that has constituted around 80c in every dollar of tax I've paid, so I'm interested in finding out more about your "womens' government" idea, but just not in this thread. It's having a tough enough time as it is with all the fundamentalist athiests jumping on the jihad bandwagon.