The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > The Rise of Atheism - Convention

The Rise of Atheism - Convention

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 25
  7. 26
  8. 27
  9. Page 28
  10. 29
  11. 30
  12. 31
  13. ...
  14. 63
  15. 64
  16. 65
  17. All
Pericles, he stated :

<<the age of the earth>>>reveal..where in the bible..it says 6000 years ya retard

In that sense, it was used as a derogatory word. Call me harsh if you will.

http://www.theage.com.au/news/film/mental-disability-groups-in-uproar/2008/08/13/1218306943095.html

"When I heard about it, I felt really hurt inside," said Special Olympics global messenger Dustin Plunkett.

"I cannot believe a writer could write something like that. It's the not the way that we want to be portrayed. We have feelings. We don't like the word retard. We are people. We're just like any other people out there. We want to be ourselves and not be discriminated against."
Posted by Gee Suss, Thursday, 22 October 2009 1:29:16 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Personally, when I see more than one ellipses in the first sentence, I stop reading...
I wonder if the ellipses are used to mark a pause, as the writer stops for another drag on the bong?
Posted by Grim, Thursday, 22 October 2009 6:09:22 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
as usual david says little worhy of reply

hey gee-sussy..you forgot to attribute..the quote..you plagerised
http://www.jesusallaboutlife.com/2009/02/27/the-theory-of-evolution-what-a-scientific-theory-actually-means/

i studied genetics...mate...the science of genetics..is a valid science..evolution is a theory...get it?>

anybody..can read the gibberish,..you posted...little suprrise you used kims quote...also plagerised...but..a lot more informative than your inane half arrrsedd/ramble..that solicited the reply...you stole..which..you refused to accredit to kim

weak as sunshine...
only confirming you know cut and paste
and will steaL...as well as preen your..self sufficient ego's

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_drift..is explained here..using marbles...in lue of actual breeding egsamples...so simple people who have lost their marbles..can line up their dux

to quote the wiki.<<..Genetic drift..is a change in the allele frequency..within the population..due to random chance:>>...but even this is contradicting..'natural'..selectors..

conciously selecting..longer feathers/brighter colours..via the mating displays...hardly random..lol selection...mr thick-head...see you cant think three steps ahead..you and your mindnumb herd..can play your delusions on the sheep..

.you got nothing but a plagerised..half thought...stolen from genetics...quoting a theory of genetics...not evolution..a theory found..by some nutter playing with marbles

dawg..quote..from ya link...<<Speaking at the launch of his new book.."Cain",..Jose Saramago,..who won the 1998 Nobel Prize for Literature,>>>LOL

<<said society would..probably..be better off without the Bible>>>and presumably better off..buying his book about cain...lol.

so nobel price for writing...what qualification is this to under pin your thesis of evolution/..thesus of evil/religion...thesis of no god...lol..straw grasping..you lot are so mind numb..its barely worth reading your ccc-rap

percules..seems able to quote me...
despite claiming not to read me...lol
amasing...lol

anyhow nothing to...further..rebutt here...it should be self evidenbt to any who can think...there is no origonal thesis..to be heard..from the athiest herd
Posted by one under god, Thursday, 22 October 2009 8:50:30 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
What are you talking about OUG? The commenter Kim is a good friend of mine, and offered a rewording of the text in the post you nong. Exactly what have I stolen from whom? You are judging me now? A thief is that what you are here standing in judgment of me? I am getting a clearer idea from your actions just what your 'jesus' teaches.

For someone that says they studied genetics, your sure seem confused, and ignorant, and unable to read what was said clearly. Do you even know how something becomes a theory? via the scientific method. Where have I said evolution was a science? I haven't, but I will say this now, Evolutionary Biology is a science.

You obviously don't understand the theory of evolution 'mr genetics' LOL you are attributing one of the factors in it, to another. You are attributing genetic drift to natural selection. The Theory Of Evolution is not completely darwins contribution, natural selection. DNA wasn't even known then! You do understand Darwins initial findings just started a whole chain of scientific method that has added and expanded on the Theory of Evolution don't you?

LOL! c'mon some geneticist! :) haha
Come on OUG show us the evidence for creation that outmatches the evidence of evolution :) hehehe you crack me up you creationists, and to think 40% of USA think the way you do! wonder what the percentage is in Australia .. don't think it's anywhere near that, I would hope for educations sake.
Posted by Gee Suss, Thursday, 22 October 2009 9:49:27 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
highpriest suss geee quote..<<..getting a clearer idea..just what your..'jesus'..teaches.>>>,..clearly your..lol..15 years of study..of the bible...was wasted.....how ignorant..your..'study'...was

<<your sure seem confused/ignorant,..and unable..to read..what was said clearly.>>>...you voice this complaint/..so frequently...it has become..completlly meaningless

<<know how something..becomes a theory?>>>..do you?

<<the scientific method.>>..those who have no clue..by far outnumber those who do..and you..clearly..have no clue

<<Where I said evolution..was..a science?>>>.....im not rereading your gibberish,..to prove bukiss to you..as you claim..all the..''science method''...under the banner of athiest..by rote..

under the evolving..'theory of evolution..of genus...as...implied by retards..via..''the evolution of species'

i know..that as much as you say..<<..I haven't,>>..this much is clear to all...but clearly you have..

in disclaiming it..you appear the babbling/retard...[ressesive throw back/cull]

<<,.You obviously..don't understand..the theory of evolution>>>lol skipping from biology...a science,...back to the theory of genus evolving..lol..how droll..

if..you dont comprehend the meaning of...under/stand..

..your correct...i dont understand to..the theory of genus evolving...

but those..not knowing under/stand means stand's under...you dont realise..species evolving..dont validate genus..evolving genus

to re-quote you lol

'LOL you are attributing one of the factors..in it,..to another based not in it...LOL

<<You are attributing genetic drift..to natural selection.>>>..your saying..dosnt quote what i said..strawboy..clearly your con-prehention skills are lacking..now deciet too...lol

<<The Theory Of Evolution..is not completely darwins contribution,>>.USE the full title..oh head/.retarded one...'evolution OF THE SPECIES'...not genus...

darwin was the only auther..of the''evolution of species''...but your too thick..to noticve the divergent qualifications..inherant between his facts..of species..and your delusions on genus

<<understand Darwins..just started a whole chain of scientific method>>>..lol...do you now claim..darwin invented science method ?

...he used it...as millions of others do/did/will...all except you know its roots..extend way back before darwin

rewrites..of your own words

LOL!..c'mon some highpriest of athism..you are:) haha

sussgee..show us the evidence for first life..by chance/fluke...that first living...mate name it's genus at least...it evolved into..which new genus...replicate/mate

present the evidence..even science..daRES NOT GIVE/name..that names/REPLICATES..THE LOL...<<evidence of evolution>>as you clearly dont have a clue...i cant be bothered trying to comprehend your insane rambling...but not thinking..is an athiest trait...

as the wheat..drifts ever further from the tares..you call a black thread white
Posted by one under god, Friday, 23 October 2009 6:46:36 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
You're still taking it far too seriously, Gee Suss.

>>In that sense, it was used as a derogatory word. Call me harsh if you will.<<

oug uses the word in the same fashion that the Irish are allowed to tell Irish jokes without it being deemed derogatory, Jews tell jokes against themselves, and only black dudes are allowed to call themselves niggaz.

As I pointed out, he sees himself in this light, so it must be ok.

On much the same topic.

>>I wonder if the ellipses are used to mark a pause, as the writer stops for another drag on the bong?<<

Sadly, far more prosaic.

It is a device oug has become accustomed to adopt over the years in order to bypass the 350 word limit.

For one post I recall he managed an extra 100 words using this method, but I think it is now just a nervous tic.

I have to say, though, I really like your theory.
Posted by Pericles, Friday, 23 October 2009 7:42:57 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 25
  7. 26
  8. 27
  9. Page 28
  10. 29
  11. 30
  12. 31
  13. ...
  14. 63
  15. 64
  16. 65
  17. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy