The Forum > General Discussion > The Rise of Atheism - Convention
The Rise of Atheism - Convention
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Page 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- ...
- 63
- 64
- 65
-
- All
Posted by one under god, Saturday, 24 October 2009 8:06:54 AM
| |
One under god,
I think we have to revert to the one question at a time with sub questions for you. You stated clumsily: “<<90%..of species have gone extinct..>>>yes...the genus dinsaur...” I know there are various stories in creationist religious circles as to what happened to the dinosaur with some saying they didn’t go on the imaginary Ark, some that they were young and still others they were in egg form. Which particular fantasy is yours in all of this? Is it that Yahweh/Jesus saw it was too much of a problem to confine dinosaurs and left them out of the impossible boat to drown, or that Mr, Mrs Noah and selected rellies looked after young dinosaurs for many months, or was it that this small group of people sat on the eggs and hatched them after the subsidence of the waters whilst sitting on a cold and wet mountain top devoid of food. (If it’s the egg story, how long do dinosaur eggs remain viable and what evidence do you have for that) So this leads to my question and sub question: What is your particular fantasy about this and what evidence do you have to support it? And how many different ‘kinds’ of dinosaurs does your particular delusion include? Of course, you will not address these fundamental issues but continue to attack evolution. That is an answer in itself. Davi Posted by Atheist Foundation of Australia Inc, Saturday, 24 October 2009 10:28:18 AM
| |
OUG
Re; Thursday 22/10/09 8.50.30pm The Term DAWG is that just a type error Further I am not an Athiest but I do have an open mind to them I am not an outright God peddler and have little time for those that are but have the decency to allow them thier belief and faith as long as it does not interfere with my own As far as God believers the Legal profession is supposed to be tied to it and what I have experienced with that side of life in regards my son's case and now my own if they are an example of the belief in God no wonder more are declaring Athietism and your lot are losing ground Thanks Dave PS the one that asked about the link between David and Zeus contact graysond49@yahoo.com I will send a photo Posted by dwg, Saturday, 24 October 2009 1:00:05 PM
| |
oh the poor da-da-vid..is livid...he really cant keep up..with the debate..but..noting the deafening silence..now the baying pack has gone mindnumb..we must humour..the lead re-tard..er..a..[thiest]
who seems..hung up on/obsessing..dinosaures..that were clearly extinct..by the times of noah.. but clearly..in his lol..15 years study...lol...of the bible,..still is hung up on..his peoples beliefs..in the je-wish fables...that result in them decieving themselves..to be only 6000...or so years old... despite repeatedly..refusing to point out ...where..in the books..he delusioned..this..manifest ERROR..from but leave..the hippy dropout..his delusions... in lue of..real questions..lets play with the wee..mouse...david..futily flapping his gums..in his goliath/big topic...beyond his ken.. and accept...like all athiests..who/..can-not collectively..nor individually..CANT..validate their delusions..into..egsistant/..extensive...science fact the head athiest/davidian..ofF..the anti-christ...quote<<<..I think>>>..very little...thinking...but..yes you think...lol ..[just so we..can get on..to real questions...but mate..know we all can think...even that dolt...gee..how..suss <<we have to..revert to the one question..at a time>>>..i presume your speaking..for..your fellow retards...with no questions/nor thesis..of their own,... ..so i will humour..thee...even though..where you say one..you clearly take licence..after making the point..to ask more...lol.. not all..of the low standard..i hope..[in vain...lol <<with sub/questions>>>..wow..all them words..to ask nothing mate reads more like yet another STATEMENT ..IN LUE OF..PRESENTING YA THEORY.. OR YOUR..LOL..SCIENCE to quote..the mindless dolt...quoting me..,quoting gee...haw.seesaw...suss/puss who davi/..claims stated clumsily: “<<90%..of species have gone extinct..>>> to which i replied....yes...the genus dinsaur...”dinosaur genera..has many species..[within it]...but see..those missing links..are different genus...see http://home.online.no/~padron/cladograms.htm For Species names..look at the Genera list http://home.online.no/~padron/generalist.htm read the link...learn the difference http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_classification but that..clearly..was beyond..the simpleton/davidion's comprehention.. seems..[ignorance goes with the job...chief/davidian/head/athiest...lol he then blathers on with two parragraphs of delusion..then some one liners <<So this>>>delusion<<..leads to my question../sub question>>> ...noting the deleted delusions..must/thus..have been his thesis <<What is your particular fantasy>>. your a sick puppy..like ya under dawg <<what evidence do you have>>>..its your delusion...present... YOUR ..thesis <<many different ‘kinds’ of dinosaurs>>..no bull/shirlock ..read the links <<you will not address..these fun=da-mental issues>> >explain your thesis... you claim...FUNDA_mental..issues.. ...ex-pound..ya theory..not ya meat <<<continue to attack evolution>>> no sweat there..even retards..can read the writing on the wall...lol <<<That is an answer in itself>>>> i guess it has to be.. ...because your too ignorant.. to frame better questions. Posted by one under god, Saturday, 24 October 2009 2:54:29 PM
| |
One under god,
Now we are getting somewhere. So, between the time of the alleged Eve and Adam and Noah, dinosaurs were on earth. And interestingly enough, no fossils of humans are in the same strata as dinosaurs and no humans below the dinosaur strata. Another very easy question needed here. Try to answer it intelligently and not in your normal jumbled fashion. I’m not expecting an answer as you still haven't answered the last one. Do you accept the earth is around 4 billion years old, around 6,000 years old or have you another figure? Don’t point me to a previous nonsensical post of yours. BTW. I don’t read your posts, much like everyone else on this Forum, I just skim through the rubbish to find the sense. So far, zero results. :)) David Posted by Atheist Foundation of Australia Inc, Saturday, 24 October 2009 3:32:04 PM
| |
OUG, you have not answered my question.
You have circled around it with trying to state dogs breed cats, which is missing the whole point that the 'tree of life' is a spreading out and diversification over millions of years. Either you do not understand evolution, or you are deliberately trying to misrepresent it. Diversification in evolution over millions of years, has whats led to the tree of life. You misrepresent when you try and state that evolution claims a jump from one outward branch to another. Which seems to be the basis of your whole argument. What are you claiming is in place, that stops speciation, and further diversification in evolution? If you cannot provide that, you cannot disprove evolution. Posted by Gee Suss, Saturday, 24 October 2009 3:56:36 PM
|
yet..the conclusion..that fish/breed mammals...is fantasy/theory
<<If there was no mystery,..there would be..no science at all>>>lol
science claims known knowns.../claims repeatability..
but now..it has mystery...lol..in lue of answers
<<things..are way ahead>>..quote from your link...<<In our field,..we have enormous amounts of data..but cannot make sense of it..all.>>lol
suss quote..<<science can't explain>>>..lol..i know
<<<state what barrier exists..that stops speciation,>>>
within the genus...within the species..
they are two divergent levels...
poor/..retarded suss
the davidian wannabe..god head..<<It is difficult to state accurately..lol..when closely related species...lol..are actually classified as distinct.>>>[new genus...lol
you lot..got a blind-spot...
see species..evolving within genus...
isnt macro evolution..of genus...ie..[genus/fish...into genus/sheeple..you
<<most agree..lol..that being unable psychologically....wtf..or physiologically..to breed...is a separation of species>>>..lol..species..NOT GENUS..so..tell suss/gee..to stop shaking his bacon,..at his sheep
<<Kangaroos..are physically capable of..breeding together..but are habitually not able>>>...but if it did..the fruit would be..some form of kangeroo....not an ecidna
<<<Herring gulls>>>..oh yeah the ring...species...where gulls/..genus...lol...breed..genus/gulls/...lol..micro/within species..not macro/..exta/genus
how/..suss..<<if..we are discussing..species>>>
..no..the topic/..implication..behind evolution..
is making..a new genus...but you lot..are re-directing..using species
<<90%..of species have gone extinct..>>>yes...the genus dinsaur...
Criteria for designating..dinosaur genera..has many species..[within it]...but see..those missing links are different genus...
http://home.online.no/~padron/cladograms.htm
For Species names..look at the Genera list
http://home.online.no/~padron/generalist.htm
read the link...learn the difference
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_classification
you dont know..
the difference..between genus/..species/..genera...
they are..not..the same thing
<<In our field,>>>lol..atheism
<<we have enormous amounts of data..>>lol
<<..but cannot make sense of it all...>>>lol
<<OUG is stating...>>>..evolution happens..in species..within its genus...and has never been confirmed..to mutate..away from its genus
susss says<<..'micro-evolution'....There are literally..millions of scientific papers..and examples of evolution..of this MICRO/type happening..all around us.>>>yes..all within their genus genotype
then reveals..he dont know his genus/..from his species...lol..
<<This combination,..change and mutation/..within species..directly cause speciation,..or..the origin of new species...>>>..note species making secies...ALL WITHIN THE GENUS..OF ITS KIND...=micro
MACRO_evolution..says..like..does not make..like...
ie..a fish..became a..not fish....lol
<<what process..is he claiming..is in place..that stops speciation>>>...divergent genus...learn the difference
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_classification
please..provide proof...of new genus...from other genus
<<<and..further divergence..in the higher taxa>>lol..abouve species...lol....what process?...use the right terms....your miss-directed/delusions...ignora-rants..know's no bounds