Dear Suze,
No matter how species were propighated inbreedingh took place and you are very nieve if you think otherwise. In cattle inbreeding was practiced last centuary to identify and get rid of inferior lines in the breed. Outcrossing is a much less harsh way to breed as when inferior animals show up in inbreeding the WHOLE line is culled. The Bull monkey was used over his daughters and grandaughters to fix the type in santa gertrudus breed. Monkey was the foundation sire of the breed.
Richie

hey ritchie..[i never recalled that one]...no im more into jesus's stuff..tares/wheat/love god by loving neighbour..emmanuel[god with-in]

and dont sweat about me..[and pop]...dad loves us all equally,
sure it could get annoying/or a worry for some.
.but dad loves everyone..[even them pesky a'thiest loyalists of evolving faith/cvhance..who insult/fear/dread..that they cannot concieve...thats all living/all loving..light sustaining life/logic/love

sussieonline quote<<<I ..haven't ever heard of one animal..reproducing another..different animal as such...Has anyone else?>>>thats sort of my point dear/...lol...

remember your on the side/..of apes breed humans...that fish produced mammals...that fish changed genus..from cold blood..into warm blood..scales into fur..fur into feathers..teeth into beaks...

come-on its your theory...your the one claiming..<<..one animal..genus>..reproducing another/..different animal..genus....<<as such...Has anyone else?>>..not even science has recorded nor observed it to happen..[or have happend....see its the..'THEORY..of evolution...get it...THEORY...


life makes life..thats NOT..what your saying...
birds breed birds/..apes breed apes/..fish/breed/fish/..spiders breed spider...its your theory.;.scaley/gilled..fish breed..land lizards with lungs..[and shoulderblades/pelvisbones feet/hooves...etc]..not me

http://dinosaurs.about.com/gi/o.htm?zi=1/XJ/Ya&zTi=1&sdn=dinosaurs&cdn=education&tm=14&gps=84_704_1259_654&f=00&tt=14&bt=0&bts=0&zu=http%3A//palaeo.gly.bris.ac.uk/dinosaur/supertree.html

here is a dinosaur tree..please advise how..that fish creature..that became mamal...became dinosaur/..became monkey became you..ie..how fish evolved..evolved into dinosaurs/..spiders/snakes lizards..frogs etc...hoe doth the din0saw tree..joins into it..all

but thats ok ..you lot dont have a clue...dosn't dino extinction...sort of limit the time for the ape to become man,..timming is everything..

http://www.answersingenesis.org/onlinestore/gateway.asp?PageType=detail&UID=10-3-014

how about the feather thing..[any of you read it...all..[thought not]

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/03/0315_060315_dinosaur.html?source=rss
Scaly New Dinosaur Creates Flap Over Feathers' Evolution

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/03/0315_060315_dinosaur_2.html
Chiappe says the new fossil didn't seem to bear any physical evidence of feathers, missing or not.

"You could expect to see follicle..[in the skin],..small pits that contain feather buds...We don't see them in Juravenator,"..Chiappe said.

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v440/n7082/full/nature04579.html
The absence of feathers or feather-like structures in a fossil phylogenetically nested within feathered theropods5,..indicates that the evolution of these integumentary structures might be more complex than previously thought.

Scaly Dino Find Complicates Feather Evolution
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=scaly-dino-find-complicat

http://www.sciamdigital.com/index.cfm?fa=Products.ViewIssuePreview&ARTICLEID_CHAR=55F34354-2B35-221B-676E19DEFD1A3F51
The origin of feathers..is a specific instance..of the much more general question..of the origin of evolutionary novelties..structures that have no clear antecedents..in ancestral animals and no clear related structures..(homologues)..in contemporary relatives.

Although evolutionary..theory..provides a robust explanation.for the appearance of minor variations in the size and shape of creatures and their component parts,...it does not yet..give as much guidance for understanding the emergence..of entirely new structures,..including digits,..limbs,..eyes and feathers.


but..
http://images.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http://c0116801.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/090926Dino2.jpg&imgrefurl=http://richarddawkins.net/article,4368,n,n&usg=__Q7uLmHRR2MKzu9TrgHccV48x2c8=&h=230&w=350&sz=70&hl=en&start=129&sig2=lZ4lqkG2iE8a_H6NS662uQ&tbnid=UXNwxJO-Yt7R1M:&tbnh=79&tbnw=120&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dfossil%2Bfeather%26gbv%3D2%26ndsp%3D18%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DMEDA,MEDA:2008-36,MEDA:en-GB%26sa%3DN%26start%3D126&ei=fsTPSuC9CJri7AP8rK33AQ

DORKINS reports it confirms feathered dinosaurs...lol
guess which article he quoted
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/sep/24/dinosaur-fossil-discovery-china

loll word for word[..cutting off the last bit...lol
does give an imaginative deception[picture...of the non bird anyhow...droll...lol

or try here..with the dorkins..going head to head with a creationist...lol...looks like he got caught..with his hand,..in/on the cookie box...evolution is for those...with a mind full of feathers..lol

http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=265153670&blogId=505887230

ok sancho's...
will see your link
and raise my own

Ancient feathered animal challenges dinosaur-bird link
http://images.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http://osu.orst.edu/dept/ncs/photos/longis.jpg&imgrefurl=http://oregonstate.edu/dept/ncs/newsarch/2000/Jun00/birds.htm&usg=__ZpOY8vPAnPVItTjOVm4NKJ9Qces=&h=937&w=1296&sz=778&hl=en&start=73&sig2=7tpOMMIu9pBFVlLw00X-eQ&tbnid=qX1rowzcJdvq2M:&tbnh=108&tbnw=150&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dfossil%2Bfeather%26gbv%3D2%26ndsp%3D18%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DMEDA,MEDA:2008-36,MEDA:en-GB%26sa%3DN%26start%3D72&ei=pFvPSvHrGZaY6gOXjPXtAQ

and raise these other isues..[i left off last nights search

dino feathers are no such thing

http://images.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http://www.amnh.org/learn/pd/dinos/gallery/images/W3G_1_sinosaur.jpg&imgrefurl=http://creationevolutiondesign.blogspot.com/2007/05/dinosaur-feathers-are-no-such-thing.html&usg=__ezWWf6Ga9znMDaxXGCBQnHUFluQ=&h=1128&w=580&sz=214&hl=en&start=96&sig2=qfiztBMN-gNA0es2ahtB_g&tbnid=zaZhVdrb9j6BFM:&tbnh=150&tbnw=77&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dfossil%2Bfeather%26gbv%3D2%26ndsp%3D18%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DMEDA,MEDA:2008-36,MEDA:en-GB%26sa%3DN%26start%3D90&ei=q13PSsGSMpPQ6gOUq7zxAQ

dorkins plagerised quote[and source link]

http://images.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http://c0116801.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/090926Dino2.jpg&imgrefurl=http://richarddawkins.net/article,4368,n,n&usg=__Q7uLmHRR2MKzu9TrgHccV48x2c8=&h=230&w=350&sz=70&hl=en&start=128&sig2=mTWPrgh-FNIdCexrz7E3iA&tbnid=UXNwxJO-Yt7R1M:&tbnh=79&tbnw=120&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dfossil%2Bfeather%26gbv%3D2%26ndsp%3D18%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DMEDA,MEDA:2008-36,MEDA:en-GB%26sa%3DN%26start%3D126&ei=7GPPSrnqLZvo7APqruH6AQ

the desperate search for feathers
http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2007/05/23/science-dinosaur-feather.html

an evolution holy book
http://books.google.com.au/books?id=mMDFQ32oMI8C&pg=RA1-PA76&lpg=RA1-PA76&dq=feathered+dinosaurs+rebutted&source=bl&ots=sET_lIO3uN&sig=4w-6leaWR59LLeD1IMdiVcO4Fcw&hl=en&ei=MH7QSpH-LYOG6wPk8uHuAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CB0Q6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=&f=false

its sad that those who claim evolutions/faithlessness in the godhead concept...never read darwins works

http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F1583&viewtype=text&pageseq=1

sorry about the size of the links

dear One under God,
Is it a relative of darwin's writing Obama's Health Care bills. Think of all the climate change with long windedness.