The Forum > General Discussion > Evolution where to now
Evolution where to now
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Page 6
- 7
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
do we have a describing word..and a naming word..or adjective..but somehow evolution....is axchieved naturally[not very scientific..it is used indescriminantly...please advise specificly..if evolution is a noun or adhective...
..explain how it is valid..as science repeat-ablitity...or as a science methodology..[or adds to explaining genomic evolution..not just natures/survivability...
it cleverly...naturally describes what is..[was by nature..[not science...thus not science nor evolution...simply a named unknowable..that appears a science method..[adjective]..but is a buzz word..noun..descriptive of nature/natural process,..but not a science method
while were at it please define..the science of natural..[that does this 'selection'...]..your hypnotised by the buzz words...missing the forest for the trees...every bit of life teaches us about god..who sustains all living ..so it appears..via..'natural'...selectors..not selecetions
but naturally..natural..dosnt mean that much..[in terms of science methodology]...how does..'natural'..define/explain sciernce is bukkiss...its spin for children
we dont know...natural=science..that naturally fools/who reject the god concept..jump on as some clever words describing a non science.. natrure..as evidence of natural selection..meaning/explaining science as methodocal..predictable/progressive evolution...when its not
naturally..chance works on probability/chance...science needs to be more specific..than the so called faith based alternative/generalities...of the other religiously held faiths
if you cant repeat it..its chance..not science...
and no repeat-ablity..nor science method..has been tendered..thus no validations of science has been offered...
thus informing not/those..with faith based ignorance...who's faith falls upon science...have the same unthinking/uncomprehending mantra/faith..as those who claim religious/belief..but dont read the holy texts...to confim it for themself
darwin could well have wrote genus..[but he did write species...just cause you lot are too ignorant to learn the difference..isnt science proof of nothing...
and certainly dont rebut god/the creator[naturally]..the nature..behind natural