The Forum > General Discussion > The real reason for the NRL group sex 'scandal'
The real reason for the NRL group sex 'scandal'
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 71
- 72
- 73
- Page 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- ...
- 91
- 92
- 93
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
rejection is so painful, isn't it socky?
Dance little sock-puppet....
Houellebecq, I actually tend to agree with your comments regarding the nature of much of the "study" that is being undertaken at uni today. However, the traditional "hard" fields like the sciences, engineering, law etc are still growing their share of the total student enrolments faster than the "soft" courses like anthropology, sociology or women's studies, attractive as those fields may be to the weak-minded.
I am still waiting for the feminist apologists to tell me why they think that's a good thing...
The point is that those students will become the professional class of the future and men are being increasingly locked out of the opportunity to participate. Given the demonstrated capacity of women to control a debate from outside the political power structure (but not outside the domestic one "not tonight dear, I'm terribly stressed about that bill you're voting on next week"), what chance is there once they control the power structure from inside that excluded men will ever be able to redress the imbalance? My guess is that it is almost vanishingly small.
IOW, this generation may well be the last chance for men in the West to have a genuine say in what the shape of our society is to be in future. Once "mother knows best" feminists control the agenda totally, the male viewpoint will be completely rrelevant to the political process and authoritarianism will be "for our own good".
I don't see that as a worthy aspiration for a democratic society.