Whether or not Master is a sockpuppet, s/he certainly has Antiwomen's measure (although I'm doubtful about the 'socialist' bit).

More conjecture from Antiwomen about his imagined feminist conspiracy in the media. I read that story early in the week on the ABC News website, and it's still there: http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/06/22/2604559.htm .

I think that you might find that the story was eclipsed in the Australian media, like almost every other event in the world, by the endless coverage of boys playing dirty tricks on each other in Federal Parliament. Not to mention the overwhelming coverage of a certain football match, in Queensland at least.

Rather than producing non-evidence for his purported feminist conspiracy, perhaps Antiwomen could find time to name just a few of the supposedly numerous corporate high flyers who were previously high level foootballers?

I won't hold my breath.

Pomeranian:"I think that you might find that the story was eclipsed in the Australian media"

Oh, it was eclipsed all right, not by political stories, but by atrociously unethical quasi-journalists with an agenda.

The same sites that have buried that story about the massively escalating violence being perpetrated by women against their male partners have much older, much more frivolous stories that have attacted almost no comments remaining up on their sites for weeks, including such important stories as this one:

http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,25660994-23272,00.html

The Courier-Mail is probably the worst offender in this regard, being stuffed to capacity with quasi-journalist agenda-pushers like Janet and Matthew Fife-Yeomans and Melanie Christensen, who have the grave responsibility of putting their byline to selected press releases and puffing them up or squashing them. By comparison the Fairfax press is positively brimming with professionalism, although it too has been largely taken over by the would-be sistergirls and standards are beginning to drop sharply.

The ABC has an editorial policy of not removing published stories unless they are found to be incorrect. I wonder how long that's going to last with the rise of the media-grrrls?

Now down you get, little fella, those skidmarked undies are already promised to your new "Master". Ask her nicely and she might let you have a sniff.

Anti I found one, if Rugby counts:

http://www.fxj.com.au/corpinfo/kirk.htm

David Kirk
CEO, Fairfax Holdings Limited

Apart from the business arena, he represented New Zealand in rugby union from 1983-1987. He played for the Otago and Auckland provinces and captained the All Blacks in 1986 and 1987. In 1987, under his leadership the All Blacks won the inaugural Rugby World Cup. In 1987 he was awarded an MBE for services to rugby. In 1987 he took up a Rhodes Scholarship at Oxford University, studying Philosophy, Politics and Economics. His first degree was in Medicine. He graduated from the University of Otago in New Zealand in 1985.

<"The same sites that have buried that story about the massively escalating violence being perpetrated by women against their male partners... ">

It's not buried, the story with absurdities quoted by your Menz Nutz is still there.

The report says that women now perpetrate 2,336 (up from less than 1,000) out of more than 25,000 cases of domestic violence.

If you were the least interested in mens safety, you'd be spending at least equivalent time ranting about the other > 40,000 cases of assault perpetrated against men by OTHER MEN.

As I have told you repeatedly, there are shelter services for men. Services will broker accommodation if needed. However, bear in mind a few other aspects:

1. Most men have the physical strength and financial resources to leave the situation; most female victims, especially from lower socio-economic groups, don't.

2. Men are less likely to have to leave with children in tow because women do about 75% or more of the child care.

3. There is a difference between a single incident and a reign of terror. While it's become menz mythology (lies) that women use emotional and verbal abuse, men are just as capable of using those methods of abuse as well.

IF U R CONCERNED ABOUT THE SAFETY OF MALES, WHY R U NOT RAILING AGAINST MEN WHO R VIOLENT TO OTHER MEN ??

- and please stop talking about your crotch and skid marks. It's barfable and portrays you as a very unattractive person.

Pynchme

<< IF U R CONCERNED ABOUT THE SAFETY OF MALES, WHY R U NOT RAILING AGAINST MEN WHO R VIOLENT TO OTHER MEN ?? >>

I have asked this question before on OLO, the likes of A-septic are far more concerned that women just might achieve equal power with men, that they fail to notice what has always been.

A-septic if you think the Master is a sock for JW how do you explain these posts?:

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=2893#65499

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=2887&page=0#65269

I see my mistake, I have asked A-septic to partake in some rational thought. Well, I can still hope.

Who does Antiseptic think Master is a puppet for?

I'm enjoying this thread immensely. I can't help feeling that Anti's made a bet with someone on how many conspiracy theories he can invent to support his bizarre statements before people start refusing to talk to him.

If not, it looks like his wife left him AND he was smacked around by her. No wonder he has such rabid opinions about men hanging on to their strength and dignity.