Well, now at long last we've established that his NRL conspiracy is all in his own head, just an opinion based on his made up "assumptions". ALL OF COURSE PRESENTED AS 'FACT'- - - - up until his forced admission.

He had no choice but to finally admit he had ZERO proof that shows an actual NRL/Channel 9 conspiracy exists to gain unassailable power for women within NRL clubs.

The topic itself is of course ludicrous, and it's interesting to note that after I finally forced him into his admission, he's now degenerated into juvenile 'attempted' taunts and defensive invective.

By the way, he keeps referring to me as "sock puppet". Is this a term of abuse, or something else? Does anyone know what it means?

Edit for my above post: "He had no choice but to finally admit he had ZERO proof that shows an actual NRL/Channel 9 management conspiracy exists to gain unassailable power for women within NRL clubs based on a fabricated sex 'scandal' No proof whatsoever. Nothing. Not one word of proof.".

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Now, let's revise the 'real' reasons for the existence of this topic here:

"I hate my ex-wife for leaving me. Why did she leave? Because feminism gave her the right to. I now hate feminists.

Feminists are women. So I now hate women (women who like self determination or women who have any type of power whatsoever over men).

I will get back at my wife by attacking women, who are feminists - and therefore my wife by proxy - by claiming in an internet forum that a sex scandal was fabricated to force women into that proud bastion of masculinity, Rugby.

Now everyone will hate my wife, and no one will think that I have allowed my anger to consume me at the expense of all other thought".

“By the way, he keeps referring to me as "sock puppet". Is this a term of abuse, or something else? Does anyone know what it means?”

I so have this, they wont tell you for some reason. I had to ask someone in a private e-mail.

Here is Wikipedia :

• Sockpuppet (Internet)
A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception within an online community. In its earliest usage, a sockpuppet was a false identity through which a member of an Internet community speaks with or about himself or herself, pretending to be a different person, like a ventriloquist manipulating a hand puppet.
In current usage, the perception of the term has been extended beyond second identities of people who already post in a forum to include other uses of misleading online identities. For example, a NY Times article claims that "sock-puppeting" is defined as "the act of creating a fake online identity to praise, defend or create the illusion of support for one’s self, allies or company."

irregardless of psychotic misogynist conspiracy theories
NRL clubs should obey the same regulatory rules
as every other corporate body.
moreover, to achieve equality between women and men
government should require corporations
to make decisons by agreement
between a women's committee and a men's committee.
furthermore, government itself should be required
to make decisions by agreement
between a women's legislature and a men's legislature.

we've all just witnessed men collapse the global economy.
no-one, including the author of this thread,
wants to see the NRL collapse.

This is my first post in this thread.
Looked in a few times.
First second and third thoughts?
Humor, had to be.
Well it appears if it is few are laughing.
I believe just maybe women in club leadership rolls , the call at least is a symptom.
An attempt to help change the culture of the game.
Or the way some women see it.
In every thing the best person for the job should get the job, biases in favor or against one sex will not work.

sock-puppet:"I'm obsessed with antiseptic and he hates his ex wife"

Whatever you say, socky. Give me that address and the skid-marked undies can be yours forever.

Jewels, this particular sock puppet was here a few months ago posting under the handle "JW", which she abandoned after she was shown to have asked GrahamY to remove a post of hers that contradicted a later post. (Is your hubby still a fat bastard, JW?)She left in a hurry, claiming she was off on a world trip, but changed her handle to "Sallyg". That one got kicked off for being obsessed with all things antiseptic, so she changed again to TZ52HX and then, just a couple of days ago, bless her, she thought she'd try again, first with the old TZ52HX and then with the brand-new "Master". The poor dear really is obsessed, but she's not very bright. Sad for her, funny for the rest of us.

Belly:"In every thing the best person for the job should get the job, biases in favor or against one sex will not work."

Absolutely right. Don't let Sharon Burrow hear you say that, though...

We'll see a lot more of this sort of behind-the-scenes media manipulation of public opinion to achieve feminist goals. The media-grrls are now dominant in everything except "hard news" and finance journalism and they are going to want to flex their muscle to help their "sisters" in all those entitlement-based groups.

Just as an example, try to find this story anywhere in the on-line press as a clickable link

http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/comments/0,,25669606-23272,00.html

The story was not available as a clickable link on the News Limited or Fairfax sites within 2 days of being published and I've seen no analysis whatever of the fact that female violence against men has risen at an annual rate of over 11% for the last 10 years, while male violence against women has not increased other than in sync with population growth.
IOW, the factual data provided by the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics will be ignored in favour of a doctrinal position, solely to manipulate public opinion.

Journalism?