The Forum > General Discussion > Guantanamo II. This time it's Obama.
Guantanamo II. This time it's Obama.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
I've been quite a fan of Obama's until I discovered this little titbit, which has given me quite the cause for concern.
In Afghanistan, the US has a prison at Bagram. Here, they have also suspended the right to trial and basically are doing the same things as were done at Guantanamo.
And allow me to be crystal clear - this isn't about locally caught prisoners, that would be pretty much par for the course and I could understand that.
The prisoners at Bagram are being flown in from other countries and then are being subject to the same legal black holes which characterised Guantanamo.
Worryingly, Obama's defending this practice, despite the fact that the Supreme court has ruled it unconstitutional.
You can read more here:
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/04/11/bagram/index.html
This is indefensible. I've been trying to find a decent justification for this, but everything sounds like the same pathetic excuses I heard from the Bush supporters who tried to justify it when he did horrendous things.
Maybe somebody else can, however, I'm curious as to how this can be honourable for Obama but dishonourable for Bush.
Damnit. I actually thought Obama would be better, at least on this crucial matter.