The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Are Numbers Against the Chance Emergence of Life?

Are Numbers Against the Chance Emergence of Life?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. ...
  8. 10
  9. 11
  10. 12
  11. All
I can't believe someone was stupid enough to think that you could prove anything by sticking a computer in a cage with 6 monkeys.
Posted by Bugsy, Saturday, 11 April 2009 9:21:38 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Why-ever not Bugsy, have you seen whose been elected lately?
Common-sense is most uncommon.
Posted by Maximillion, Saturday, 11 April 2009 9:34:20 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Maximillion,
I don't think you need to look that far away have you seen a teenager's SMS lately? or maybe read a news Murdock news paper?
No one said that evolution necessarily meant improvement of the species for proof of that then look at the politicians. Intellectual Darwinism survival of the most adaptive not the smartest
Posted by eAnt, Saturday, 11 April 2009 12:29:57 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
REVEAL THE MISSING LINK's
replicate_or_explain
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=2305
chance had nothing to do with it[neither did evolution]

http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/mammal/monotrememm.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monotreme#Taxonomy

Mammals,belong to the Class Mammalia.

The Class Mammalia,in turn,belongs to the larger group known as the vertebrates(animals with backbones;also called the Phylum Chordata).
http://psychology.wikia.com/wiki/Mammal

Mammals(formally Mammalia)are a class of vertebrate animals whose name is derived from their distinctive feature mammary glands,with which they feed their young...also characterized by the possession of sweat-glands,hair,three middle/ear-bones,and a neocortex region in the brain.

Except for the three species of monotremes(which lay eggs),all mammals give birth to live young.

In some ways,monotremes are very primitive for mammals because,like reptiles and birds,they lay eggs rather than having live birth.

The mammalian line of descent..[is speculated to have]..diverged from the reptile-line at the end of the Carboniferous/period.GIVE PROOF

The majority of reptiles would evolve into modern-day reptiles,while the synapsid branch[speculativly]led to mammals.GIVE PROOF

For this reason,the Monotremata are considered the sister group to all other mammals.Living monotremes are classified in two families, the Ornithorhynchidae(platypus family)and the Tachyglossidae(echidnas).

In echidnas,the egg is carried in a pouch on the female's belly until the young hatches,at which point the barely-developed young must find a mammary gland and latch onto it for nourishment.

In the platypus,the female retires to a burrow in the bank of a river or pond.The burrow is lined with dry vegetation,and there the eggs are laid.

Male platypuses are venomous,courtesy of their crural glands.

Platypuses use electroception to locate prey by detecting electrical fields.This is a very rare stunt among mammals.

Never mind the cloaca.The genetics of platypus reproduction will blow your mind.Not only is there multichromosomal meiosis;a male platypus carries a chain of five XY chromosome pairs,XYXYXYXYXY, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prototheria

Mammals(Class Mammalia)are a group of vertebrates that includes about 5,000 species

The Class Mammalia is further broken down into the various orders of mammals which include:

Monotremata(egg-laying marsupials)
Marsupialia(marsupials)
Insectivora(insectivores)
Chiroptera(bats
http://jurisdynamics.blogspot.com/2006/09/monotremata.html
Monotremes defy the English word mammal,which implies breasts,or at least nipples...Well,monotremes make milk but don't have nipples.

mammals derived from the verb meaning suck

i speculate genomic evolution is fraud[regardless of how many darwinian apes pushing random buttons]
Posted by one under god, Sunday, 12 April 2009 12:20:55 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
There are millions of stars out there and millions of planets going around them. There are quadrillions of molecules on each running into each other all the time. Give this mix 4 and a half billion years and something had to come out of it. The fact that Homo sapiens was spat out then end of this time is the most clear evidence for the lack of any ‘intelligent’ design.
Posted by Agronomist, Sunday, 12 April 2009 2:59:30 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Agronomist<<There are millions of stars out there and millions of planets going around them.>>yes..but we are talking about this star, and these planets[and moons]of which but one has life..as a proven certainty

<<There are quadrillions of molecules on each running into each other all the time.>>so we are talking about molecular life..genesis by randon collision.. sort of reminds me of the abgensis no one can validate from the last debate on abiogensis... then as now it is a speculative statement [that begs for proof],have we such proof?

<<Give this mix 4 and a half billion years and something had to come out of it.>> i would hesitate to ask how long this universe egsisated [in your mind]from the big bang[that ever looks less likely]that perhaps has had 13 billion or so odd years to create us in this moment in time[noting humans claim to have 'evolved but less than 100,000 years ago, and that apes egsisted for over half a billion

i wont rehash the facts we didnt get sorted out last time[re evolution into new genus NEVER having been recorded or observed[or how the species varies within its specie mean, but they are all as you know unresolvable[or if resoplved remain unreplied at that last topic posting

<<The fact that Homo sapiens was spat out then end of this time is the most clear evidence for the lack of any‘intelligent’design.>> my dear brother please present your proofs?HOMOsap proves just what EGSACTLY, natural selection[evolution of SPECIES?]your a trained scientist, give ius some faulsifiable science FACT of evolutionary process

if fact prove it

if ...''for the lack of any 'intelligent' design'.. prove it

im so sick of people pretending 'natural selection' is a science validation..[or any valid proof to explain that..which at best a hypothesis],..or maybe a theory...[but definitivly not science fact]

see a previous respondant 'dared' to say yes but if someone kept the right bits...lol,..that would instantly refute the monkeys doing it by natural selectivity...[chance]..if 'NATURAL' selection how come no new ape species selected..[man is definitivly [taxonimicly not ape]at best a common ancestor is HYPOTHOISED[theorised]
Posted by one under god, Sunday, 12 April 2009 5:11:42 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. ...
  8. 10
  9. 11
  10. 12
  11. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy