The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > For the sake of OLO ...rule changes?

For the sake of OLO ...rule changes?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 8
  7. 9
  8. 10
  9. Page 11
  10. 12
  11. 13
  12. 14
  13. ...
  14. 40
  15. 41
  16. 42
  17. All
Oh! before I forget, Anyone thinking of having a child in the future! Have your act together, because you will need to apply for licence to have one.

Have a nice day.

EVO
Posted by EVO2, Sunday, 1 February 2009 2:38:35 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Examinator “Seeing that I can't achieve the goals iI set for this Topic and both you feel this is an attempt to get at you personally...which it wasn't.”

I never thought that, I think this thread is a hoot… as I have said a few times before… I love this thread… absolutely love it….

So stop imputing my response based on projection of your own insecurities…

It is the chronically insecure and emotionally crippled who crave regulations and rules…

whole people go along with “libertarian” values . .

“with out your customary abuse/insults and condecention or obfuscation.”

Oh how we all love being pre-judged by a self appointed inquisitor

It just craves a good slapping in response

“Col, what specifically would degrade, change the facts of your opinion if it was presented in the same reasonable manner as your reponse to Graham in his latest article post?”

I give back as I receive… and in the GY thread, it was my first post and I did appreciate the posts and agreed with many of them but

When someone attempts a unilateral judgment or admonishment of me for (say) supposedly making a personal attack on someone who was not named… it pisses me off and I will respond in kind.

So too, when someone, decides to steal for themselves that which is owned by the OLO host and attempts to talk down to me from a perspective of a extreme pomposity …

They just set themselves up to fall…

and I happen to be of a temperament to help them …

fall that is.

“Ok I admit it I believe that you both might actually answer an unloaded direct question each that has crossed my curiosity especially given your respective stated social attitudes”

I assume that is a rhetorical comment or am I allowed to pass my own judgment, based on my own “social attitudes” upon it?

Chainsmoker… im with the riff-raff… it is really no different to the “'good quality' mob”

(except we leave the light on when having sex (or love or whatever you “'good quality' mob” call it).
Posted by Col Rouge, Sunday, 1 February 2009 3:23:07 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Foxy “What a total waste of time, energy, and emotion this has been.”

That depends on your POV or “opinion” and this is, after all, an “opinion forum”

Speaking personally I think it is an absolute ripper of a thread….

I am enjoying every post from both sides of the “divide”

Meredith… “Boaz… I thought he was great”

DB and I catch up (in real life) from time to time…. Although DB and I disagree on several things I feel able to confirm, You are right in your assessment of him.

Examinator “We are indeed all human and I as much as any.”

Oh cannot let that one pass

you more often claim to be perfect, yet now you claim to have feet of clay…..

You must have experienced a “Damascun” moment recently.

Bronwyn “Being a fellow conservative is clouding your judgement here I think meredith. :)”

I still have to come back to you on your claim of me supposedly ‘attacking’ … the unnamed and unidentified

But you do set yourself up when you write lines like that

EVO “My cryptic words are here for you too take, if you want to listen.

3 Billion! The Target, and how?”

Actually, both myself and Ludwig and possibly others on this thread have made similar comments on threads specific to that issue and even AGW threads (being a consequence of the same problem

I am sure your input would be much more appreciated there or when such a thread is running.

Bronwyn “I will continue to pick you up on obvious excesses and inaccuracies at times, but for the most part I will leave your arrogance, sarcasm, and Thatcherite worship well alone as I've always done.”

Make your mind up.

that you choose this thread to espouse your objections to Margaret Thatcher seems silly, when it has nothing to do with the topic.
So why bring her into the debate…?

MT’s contribution to UK national economy is still benefiting the incumbent socialist government of today (re her EU negotiations) as well as fixing the previous Callaghan, socialist Mess.
Posted by Col Rouge, Sunday, 1 February 2009 4:03:10 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Bronwyn,
In contrast, Hats off to Belly for raising the Sea Kittens thread. He beat me to it. It was such a stupid concept that it was open for ridicule and clearly aimed to give distorted concepts to kids. You should have seen the ridicule it got on other blogs.

It rates nearly as ridiculous as PETA's 'Human breast milk for ice cream' concept. I for one will continue to ridicule PETA and show the stupidity of its supporters.

I disagree with Belly on a number of things, but he is genuine and has a lot of common sense. If only more political party members were like him.
Posted by Banjo, Sunday, 1 February 2009 7:38:06 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
*waves at meri* :) no drama mate.. I'm not sure how recent my posts have been off color.. I think since I resumed my old nick maybe?

I've tolerated an absolute land fill of accusation and misrepresentation as you say.. but I don't feel weakened by that :) (*shows off mucles*...grin...kidding)

I've tended to be more blunt in the past couple of weeks.. mainly because of the Gaza situation and such delights as the Muslim child carrying the sign calling for more "swastika* treatment of Jews at a pro Gaza rally.

EXAMINATOR "What do I feel I achieve" with my religious and anti Islamic posts?

In one word 'DISCUSSION' ...ok 2 words "Discussion and THINKING"

I've seen evidence of both in some reponses. As Meri said.. I've met up with both Col and FH in person..and in neither case did we rip each other to bits.

On the issue of Islam... well.. there is such a tragic lack of understanding about this faith, that it is dangerous for national security. Yes.. thats exactly what I said.

Failure to understand the 2 most seditious forces in our community today will bring us undone over time unless we sort ourselves out.

Here they are.

Seditious
-"Literal_Quranic Islam"
-"Socialist Agitators"

The only other thing needed to bring these 2 seditious groups together are the things we have seen in the past months.

1/ Economic turmoil.
2/ Wars

In both cases they play perfectly into the socialist paragigm of "Out of chaos the new socialist order can arise"

In both cases, (specially because most wars at the moment involve Muslims) the Socialists/Communists and Muslims derive mutual benefit.
The Muslims make a noise about Gaza..and the Socialist/Communists join them to mock and tear down the Capitalist system.
The same goal...but a different end game. For one Socialist Utopia/the other-a Muslim controlled Society.

STRATEGIES.
-MultiCulturalism/Unfettered_Migration: Both Communists and Radical_Muslims benefit from promoting Multi Culturalism, as it dilutes a sense_of_Identity in Australians.

-Legal: By stifling debate with 'vilification' laws.. they also benefit.

-Public Protest: By provoking police (socialists mostly) and then claiming victimhood they both also benefit.
Posted by BOAZ_David, Sunday, 1 February 2009 8:55:10 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
This is great. A thread started due to someone's concerns about flaming and off topic contributions ends up with off topic flaming.

Sometimes I love this place.
Posted by StG, Sunday, 1 February 2009 10:31:06 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 8
  7. 9
  8. 10
  9. Page 11
  10. 12
  11. 13
  12. 14
  13. ...
  14. 40
  15. 41
  16. 42
  17. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy