The Forum > General Discussion > For the sake of OLO ...rule changes?
For the sake of OLO ...rule changes?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Page 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- ...
- 40
- 41
- 42
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Guilty.
I assumed the rules here were like rules elsewhere, but it turns out they're less specific and not so much rules as vague guidelines. There's no clear, let alone implemented, penalty system. After years here, I read them for the first time this week.
The second point:
Of miles of stuff that I find inappropriate, including people making personal threats that would be taken seriously in a court, I've never used the Recommend-This-Comment-For-Deletion button. Always assumed someone else would. My bad. Maybe. Maybe the button is a lark. Who would know?
Having said that,
This isn't the first thread of its kind, so it seems safe to assume management is happy with things the way they are. After all, we keep coming back and exposing ourselves to ads regardless.
We've been given this opportunity for free, so why would sensible management go to the trouble of incurring costs because we can't manage to appreciate what we have? The term 'tragedy of the commons' exists because people routinely abuse privileges.
Why should it be up to management to sort these things out? Are we adults capable of sorting out our own problems or children requiring constant supervision?
"This will help attract both good quality articles and good respondents…and will keep the riff-raff at bay."
We live in a democracy, where the riff-raff is otherwise known as the general public. Or the electorate every few years. Those of 'good quality' already have plenty of space to air their views (see Quadrant and the Monthly). One of the better things about this internet thingy is that the riff-raff get speaking space.
In real life I'd count as one of the 'good quality' mob. Frankly, they're no more restrained or civil than the worst offenders here. Few things would please me more than to see the 'riff-raff' manage civility better than those of 'good quality' without management intervention.