SallyG:"f he tried that, he knows he'd be held accountable"

Actually, I've tried to get the Agency to make good on their threatened Court action for years. It seems they're very big on threatening, but not so big on actually standing in front of a Court where they have to prove their case. They much prefer their unaccountable in-house processes, leaving them plenty of opportunity for cover-up. I don't really care either way any more; if they want me to deal with them they have to take me to Court and make their case, which they have no chance of doing.

If you do a google search, you'll even find a thread on another forum in which I directly challenge the General Manager of the Agency to take action against me over their claim of "defamation". That was the last anyone heard from the Agency on that site and Mr Miller declined to accept my challenge.

Now, as you're so keen to have my name made public knowledge, perhaps you and the "I consider no parts to be secret or private" JW would like to start the ball rolling?

R0bert, I suspect that the egregious JW is a contractor to the CSA who may well be in bad odour with the Agency since her protector, the unlamented Angela Tillmans was booted out. If my suspicion is correct, her extensive record of past poor behaviour would indicate that she considers all men to be guilty until proven otherwise. Having two failed marriages might help to explain that. OTOH, the attitude might well explain the failed marriages.

My God antiseptic, you are so inane (to use a word often repeated by those here to describe you). Do you possess any intellectual ability at all? Probably very little.

A person asked you to name the people you accused of unlawful acts and follow that up with your evidence of those unlawful acts and to back all that up with your name at the end. You now say the CSA refuses to take action against you, therefore, you have nothing to fear.

So do it.

Instead of being a pathetic jerk and running around the issue with crap like "do your own searches".

Answer the inquiries about the alleged unlawful acts, move on, and then grab a life.

Oh dear, the signal-to-noise ratio just deteriorated again.

phillips, do try reading for comprehension, difficult as you seem to find it. I have no intention of breaking the law of the land by publishing details of a CS/FL matter that could identify third parties, including my ex-wife and children.

If I did so, you and others who have incited the illegal action would also find yourself at the mercy of the Court. No need to say thanks, I'll take it as read.

Still, if you're interested, do that google search I keep mentioning. I'm sure you can work out how to do that eventually. Have fun.

Me (two days ago):"Now, as you're so keen to have my name made public knowledge, perhaps you and the "I consider no parts to be secret or private" JW would like to start the ball rolling?"

After which there has been dead silence from both SallyG and JW. It seems that JW is only unconcerned about privacy when it's someone else's, which would be consistent with her prior record if my suspicions expressed above are correct.

I too have waited for answers to questions you ,myself and RObert asked.
For give me for saying it like I truly think but is man hating part reason of the problem?
I am forced to have little regard for some posters, and while my comments may fan the flames they are my true thoughts.

Antiseptic has continued to display his cowardice by NOT providing proof following his claims of illegality. He, of course, knows he can't provide proof, because no illegality has occurred. But the coward is VERY happy to imply illegality, without taking responsibility for his words, and that's why he's displayed cowardice by not attaching his real name at the end of his false allegations.