SallyG:"You've made extremely serious criminal allegations, yet have shown you lack the balls to back that up with names AND proof. "

Oh dear, another one who can't use google or understand plain English. Do try harder, honey.

Now, as for your silly defence of the extremely silly JW, I'll remind you that I have made no allegation about JW, I've merely mirrored her insulting remarks to me and others. Interestingly, you take no exception to her inane comments, yet you do take exception to my own very similar ones. As I said earlier, a good dose of getting over the man-hating would do you both good, as would taking some responsibility for your own circumstances instead of expecting others to pay your way.

I note you've not commented on the fact that the abuses of the CSA are predicated on the fact that a miniscule $50 million PA is outstanding from the huge annual total of $2.6 billion in CS assessed.For the mathematically challenged, that is less than 2% of the total and amounts to a burden on the taxpayer of just $5 PA each. Those are facts, not silly little strawmen put up by the intellectually bereft.

R0bert, I have specifically named on several occasions 3 people as having colluded, one of whom was Regional Registrar at the time and who has since left the Agency under a cloud to take up a job for the grrrls as CEO of the CP League of Qld. I have made the allegations several times to the CSA in corrspondence which the Agency has chosen not to respond to. They have, however, run from a meeting they called, simply because I wished to record it.

The Agency made threats of defamation action against the site on which those details were published, but were forced to back down when their bluff was called. A simple (at least for most people) google search will reveal those details to anyone interested

Ok antieverything, for the THIRD time, you are being asked to name the people from CSA who have engaged in criminal actions during the term of their employment AND cite the *PROOF* AND print *YOUR REAL NAME*. HERE AND NOW ON THESE PAGES.

Show you possess at least a slight semblance of courage.

Stop avoiding directly answering the questions you've been asked.

Stop playing games.

Answer the questions properly and *FULLY*.

And do it HERE AND NOW ON THIS OLO PAGE.

Or stand condemned as a total waste of time, whose presence here is defined by bitterness, false allegations, avoidance and use of personal abuse.

JW:"AND cite the *PROOF* AND print *YOUR REAL NAME*. HERE AND NOW ON THESE PAGES."

erm...

already done and done elsewhere, dear. Ask one of your fellow idlers to show you how google works. It's not my job to educate you. BTW, I'd go and see someone about your blood pressure if I were you.

JW:"Show you possess at least a slight semblance of courage.

Stop avoiding directly answering the questions you've been asked.

Stop playing games.

Answer the questions properly and *FULLY*.

And do it HERE AND NOW ON THIS OLO PAGE."

You're very used to being able to bully people, aren't you dear? Your first name isn't Judith by any chance?

I'm not yours to order around, dear, so toddle off and yell at the kids or something.

JW:"a total waste of time, whose presence here is defined by bitterness, false allegations, avoidance and use of personal abuse."

I'd not have said you were a total waste of time; you provide enormous amusement for us all and I'm sure we're all very grateful.

Gee, you really are made of jelly aren't you antiseptic. You're so weak, you can't even answer a few questions.

When someone makes allegations of criminal behaviour, yet refuses to back it up or write their real life name to the allegations, it says it all!

We all know why he won't provide evidence and names and "his" name here don't we. It's because he CAN'T.

JW is right, anti is a complete waste of time with his inane refusals to prove his allegations and provide his real life name. If he tried that, he knows he'd be held accountable. He's been called cowardly. Ain't that the truth.

JW I am not stalking you.
Surprised by my clash with you in another thread I thought I would look at your post history.
Why the heat?
Why the anger?
What are you trying to achieve?
How can you see your own point of view but not even glimpse others?
I treasure my privacy.
Always will but pay my way owe no one anything am not hiding from anyone.
Why do you want posters to use their own names?
What would it achieve?
In your short post history you seem to want verbal war not two way debate.
Do you ever consider if your self assurance is miss placed?

Perhaps JW would provide the evidence to support the serious allegation she made against others on this thread in her opening post.

"What are you guys trying to hide?

This has got nothing to do with "legitimate" privacy, but EVERYTHING to do with hiding one's assets and details, in order to avoid giving one cent to one's children and/or ex partners.

And you people know it!" http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=2162#46214

Later she said "My remarks were clearly applicable only to the guilty, and not the innocent. " http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=2162#46450

At the point the original post was made no privacy, Stg, Antiseptic, myself, Divorce Doctor and Young Dan had posted to this thread.

Which of us was JW accusing of cheating the system? The wording in JW's post suggested all of us but apparently JW intended otherwise. I've never cheated on tax or falsified information supplied to legal authorities so no guilty conscience on that front but the wording still read as though I was being accused of doing so.

JW who are you accusing of "hiding one's assets and details, in order to avoid giving one cent to one's children and/or ex partners"?

Where is your evidence that any individual involved in the discussion has tried to hide assets or avoid their legal obligations to their children?

R0bert