The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Only in Australia!! This is interesting, what do olo readers think?

Only in Australia!! This is interesting, what do olo readers think?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 11
  7. 12
  8. 13
  9. Page 14
  10. 15
  11. 16
  12. 17
  13. ...
  14. 25
  15. 26
  16. 27
  17. All
continued

"Not only is our welfare system - estimated to cost a record $91 billion this year according to treasury documents - an utter joke, our immigration policies are nothing short of a train wreck. What this amounts to is a conscious policy of reverse eugenics. The stupider and less useful to society you are, the more the government pays you to breed. And the more talented and fruitful you are, the more cash you must fork out (which could be better spent passing on your genes to a worthy cause) to facilitate morons to rear an underclass of idiots

In God’s name, what self-respecting civilisation runs such insane, suicidal policies? You would think our government, hell-bent on punishing virtue and rewarding pathology, was controlled by a Chinese fifth column (speaking of the Chinese - you will freeze in hell before they ever copy our abominable social policies), so dedicated it is to ruining whatever future this country might otherwise have enjoyed as an independent, sovereign, entity.

And the connection between the immigration of unassimilable aliens and the welfare state has never been more plain. As long as Australia remains a country with virtually unlimited voting franchise, the awful truth is that importing people with sub-average talents will lead directly to bigger government - the foreign mendicants clearly have every incentive to vote en masse for whichever electoral coalition is most dedicated to mulcting the economically productive while continuing to import large numbers of ne’er-do-wells.”

Thanks Steve Edwards.

I agree with 90% of what he posted
Posted by EasyTimes, Tuesday, 15 April 2008 8:01:22 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Ah, so what we are talking about is ISLAMIC 'refugees'. That explains a lot.

I agree that the system must be reviewed to not allow these sorts of people in, and whoever reviewed their cases should be sacked.

However, they are a small minority of the refugee population and the whole should not be tarred with the same brush. I know a few non-militant christian refugees that have been tortured and strive to be productive and actually have jobs. But we aren't talking about THOSE kind are we?

I cannot comment on anything written in a blog without supporting documentation (re the amount of money Centrelink is paying).
Posted by Bugsy, Tuesday, 15 April 2008 8:26:29 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Only 90%? Traitor!

I think ET should either phone home or join People Against Live Exports, Intensive Farming and Refugees.

While I could probably enjoy a beer with individual, I think that any actual time in the company of ET and his ilk would be too much like work.

Fascinating to observe the snakepit elicited by the intitial hoax post, in the face of clear exposure and refutation. I suppose that's how hate propaganda works - unfortunately all too well, it seems.
Posted by CJ Morgan, Tuesday, 15 April 2008 8:37:16 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Ice cream, you forgot, Julian Burnside, Ponytails, The Whitlams, Byron Bay,refugee supporting and last but not least, book reading.
We can't help ourselves.
Posted by Rainier, Tuesday, 15 April 2008 9:20:46 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"Under Centrelink rules, she is entitled to almost $50,000 a year in welfare while her husband is in prison, awaiting trial."

$50,000? What rot. She got $75,000 if she got a dollar.
Posted by Vanilla, Tuesday, 15 April 2008 9:59:04 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hey Bugsy I am sure when it comes to refugee’s the most common name of any refugee that comes to Australia would be Mohammed. Make sense now? What did you want me to do use the name Jack or Mary? Sure I would then avoid being called a racist by the vacuous but then again I would also be totally inaccurate.
Mind you I like how you do in typical fashion try and put some sort of hate spin on the fact that I used the name Mohammed but its hardly surprising.

Bugsy – Dealing with Eritrea Firstly any refugee should be resettled in a place which they have something culturally and preferably linguisticly in common with. Transporting them halfway around the world makes absoultly no sense to anybody with any grasp of basic economics. How does in go? A dollar a day feeds and sends a child to school in Africa? And how much does it cost to ship the same child to Australia and do the same thing? I heard somewhere that in cost partents $250 000 to send kids to school and feed them in Australia. If you throw in some language training and “special help” seeing that there parents probably have no real education it will be even more. Do the maths people!

I don’t see why we should be shipping theses people all the way to Australia so as to feed the ignorant ego’s of people so deluded that they think it is better to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars per child to feed and educate them hear when it could be done for a dollar a day in Africa.

Its plainly obvious that the only reason people champion having refugee here is too make it LOOK like they are doing something about a problem. The fact that they dont even put a tiny dent in the overall problem is not going to stop these apparatchik of illconceived ideas. After all if these people had any sense the idea of shipping refugee here in the first place would never have been contrived.
Posted by EasyTimes, Tuesday, 15 April 2008 10:52:44 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 11
  7. 12
  8. 13
  9. Page 14
  10. 15
  11. 16
  12. 17
  13. ...
  14. 25
  15. 26
  16. 27
  17. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy