The Forum > General Discussion > why was work choices so bad
why was work choices so bad
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
- 7
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
I want you to understand I am no lie teller I indeed am a trade union official.
My pride and purpose in life is to serve my members with fairness, while earning the respect of people like you, employers, if it is possible to do both.
For this boss, for hundreds of such bosses it is not possible, HE IS REFUSING TO PAY HOLIDAY PAY!
You need to understand most construction workers traded away leave loading long ago.
And that human nature rules not dreams, some bosses are products of unwed parents, rehctub some workers are too.
Mate some unions are worse.
BALANCE
workchoices had none.
It gave some very real grubs unfair advantage
Do you know some of the worst labour hire firms , miss using workers the most, are owned by ex union officials?
Ex radical extremist union officials?
I have sat at the table with the other side this last month heard a man who helped draft workchoices and who runs our biggest construction giant.
He actually proposes massive cuts in worker incomes to bring down the price of construction.
So this country can grow he says.
What worker grow poor rich grow richer?
Good workers and good bosses are not rare we should understand warfare is not always the answer bad bosses like bad workers are your problem and mine.