The Forum > General Discussion > why was work choices so bad
why was work choices so bad
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
cw3, a wages classification structure exists in most jobs, a skills matrix.
CW3 is mid way up the ladder ,the most used step in construction.
Construction even under workchoices operated under EBAs enterprise Bargaining Agreements , almost every major construction firm , most international, offered to put one in place for 3 to 5 years before workchoices first impact.
Non wanted the first workchoices agreement around their neck.
Labour hire , casual worker suppliers did not sign EBAs they took to workchoices as a Friend.
Wages and work conditions fell through the floor.
The $550 dollars is true it represents the real difference for those hours worked.
Mostly it while reducing costs for labour fails, good workers move on ASAP and casuals stay only as long as they must.
Unions, good unions get jobs for casuals with the highest paying firms.
See the idea it is open war between unions and bosses is blind stupid, truth is good unions and good bosses have a lot in common.
workchoices? we had the debate it is dead todays leader of the conservatives has 7% support yet with out workchoices that leader may have been Prime Minister John Howard.