Paul.L, & Foxy and others

Please feel free to join in the research.

We're looking for the last time - or any time really - when a kirpan was used as a weapon in an Australian school. Nobody has yet found an instance.

There's a huge reward for the first sighting!

If you can find an example, I'll write to John Howard and say I'm SORRY that he had to put up with Malcolm Fraser's policy of Multiculturalism. Kirpans were rumoured to have been taken into the polling booths in Bennelong, and you all know how that turned out...

Dear FrankGol,

We can argue this matter 'ad nauseum' but I can see that we won't make any progress. So let's agree to disagree and leave it at that...

Foxy

In other words, you can't find any evidence to back up the absurd proposition that kirpans have been used as anything but decoration.

Merry Xmas.

Frank, when you stated that your writings were 'compelling evidence', I nearly choked on my porridge. You digressed from the original topic so maybe you were responsible for wasting your own time. Take Foxy's advice.

When CJ wrote he ceased engaging with me because 'I couldn't be bothered arguing with anybody who doesn't know what an argument is', I wondered if he wanted me to use his style of 'argument', ie, when someone offers up an opposing view, CJ spouts out 'boofhead', knuckledragger', 'clown', 'vacuous' and many more little enlightening gems. If that's what he calls 'Accepted rules of logic', how can anyone be blamed for replying in kind?

Glad to have made your Christmas, Bugsy. Must be sad if that's all you have to look forward to. Congratulations on finding my post of an opposite viewpoint. Now, your holiday quiz. Which is my true opinion and which one was I using to play 'Devil's Advocate' to string you along (not for the first time either)? First prize is a turnip (tumshie).

Frank & Jack, I see only one thing for it.

Kirpans at dawn!

(Frank, I'll be your second. Unless I see a few more of those photos of Jack, of course.)

Jack the Lad/jsp1488,

I was referring to your miserable excuses for argument elsewhere, which led me to apply the accurate descriptions of you as a knuckledragging boofhead who can only engage in vacuous sloganeering.

For example, you claimed that the Greens were "Reds in disguise", on the basis of their policies. When I challenged you to demonstrate which Greens policies were 'communist' or 'Red', you pointed to several policy areas but were completely unable to specify in what respects they were "Red". You never did - to you, if it's Green it's also self-evidently Red.

Then in another thread you vilified homosexuals because, among other things, they engage in anal sex - which is also apparently self-evidently "disgusting" and "perverted". Again, when challenged to provide reasons as to why this common practice (which is not restricted to homosexuals) is "disgusting", you were unable to provide any actual evidence. Instead, you resorted to puerile, sniggering innuendo - which is when I applied the apposite descriptors above.

You've since been revealed as a dishonest sock puppet who was banned for troll behaviour here under the user name "jsp1488", and which you're now replicating under the ID of "Jack the Lad". You're a waste of oxygen.