The Forum > General Discussion > do you think Australia is sufficiently defended?
do you think Australia is sufficiently defended?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Now for the fun.... if you want to linking an invasion to revelations, you would do well to start with the fact that the book starts with a child being taken by a red dragon. Red and Dragon are both things that are very easily linked to China. Thought you'd have trotted those examples out quick smart! However, its also supposed to be 7 headed, and I cant find a link between 7 specifically and China.
BUT, your prophecy whether it be real or imagined, ignores the fact that Christianity is strong in China, and growing stronger constantly. I would assume that a christian nation (even if not officially so) wouldnt be your "pagan invaders" (although try saying that to the Iraqi's). Actually, pagan refers to someone that is not one of the three major religions, so neither China (growing Christian faith) or Indonesia (largely muslim) would fit the bill. Maybe you should be looking at hindu (and therefore pagan) India - they've got the Bomb too remember, so its not as easy to pull them up simply with threats, as they can make good on their own.
All digs aside though, I do agree that our defence is a bit of a joke. But dont forget that because it is difficult to defend due to its size and features, this also makes it much more difficult to invade - yes you can find some deserted shoreline, but there'll be plenty of overland marching with precious little infrastructure to assist, so large centres will have PLENTY of warning to evacuate or defend if an invasion from the north ever happened.