It is now rumoured that 2 million immigrants will be brought into Australia by the end Albanese's current term. And they obviously will not be English speaking, Anglo/Celtic/European Christians. Desirable immigrants no longer want to come to a country that is just like their own: divided by suicidal multiculturalism and separate tribes with no shared values.

There is no hope for us under the uniparty, with the Coalition no better than Labor on immigration. One idiot Liberal senator, Andrew McLachlan, who has been sitting on his arse for years - unknown even in his own state of South Australia - has put in his first comment ever, on anything, by saying we shouldn't be actually calling mass immigration, mass immigration, because it is “extremely unhelpful”. It's use in debate, he says, is “irresponsible and inflammatory”.

What a dick!

The shadow immigration minister, Paul Scarr - another drone nobody has heard of - is of the same mind.

Who but a moron would vote for either branch of the uniparty and expect things to improve!

The better known senator, Bragg, is another Liberal dropkick on immigration.

The Liberal Party now has about 27% support in the polls. No wonder. The polls also show that the MASS of immigrants have no interest in the Liberal Party when they are able to vote. These Three Stooges don't seem to know that.

Cutting back drastically on immigration is the only hope these fools have of sitting on the government benches in the foreseeable future.

Dear Ttbn,

You make some good points on the topic of immigration, which I follow with interest.

However, to arrive at anything useful, first "immigration" needs to be defined, because it has more than one meaning:
(1) the natural meaning of physically arriving and staying; and
(2) the legal meaning of being granted a permanent visa and the privileges that come with it.
- and possibly more meanings too.

My position is that it is completely legitimate to play with (2) as we please and in accordance to our varied interests, but not with (1), even if it inconveniences us: while we have every right to choose our friends, we have not created this land - God did, and so it is not our place to dictate who may or may not enter it.

Restricting (2) may indirectly also help to limit (1), possibly to a significant degree, so is worth considering, so long as the principles are clear.

It will therefore be useful if you could state your own understanding of the term. Thank you.

Islam had hundreds of years to come to this continent. Why wait til now ? Would the Aborigines be better off now if the Arabs had settled here before the British ?
Let's hear from Aborigines themselves how they feel about Islam taking over ?

Rather than dealing with the cause of the Bondi terrorism - Islam, political idiots have decided to go after guns. Now there looks to be a High Court challenge coming up against any more gun laws.

I bloody ask you: 4 guns allowed instead of the current 6? What a joke! What an insult to the victims and to all Australians. Australia has turned itself into a joke, or rather its politicians and bone-headed voters have turned it into a joke.

The real tragedy is that the many stupid will again try to vote the insane in !

Indyvidual,

Yup. They will. And it's a bit late now even if they wanted change