The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Iran

Iran

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 18
  7. 19
  8. 20
  9. Page 21
  10. 22
  11. All
"Israel still got smacked around the worst it ever has in modern history"

Struth!. AC lives in a fantasy world all of his own making.
Posted by mhaze, Wednesday, 25 June 2025 3:58:06 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi AC,

These things are never clear. I was just thinking with so many Russian nuclear engineers and Putin doing it tough in Ukraine, the chances of the intelligence coming from Russia would be greater.

"Look at North Korea, why aren't they invaded or overthrown?"

Maybe because China has their back? Anyway, I think that the sentiment of Western nations these days is, "You want to live in a s'hole country then good luck to you.". Where would you rather live? North or South?
Posted by Fester, Wednesday, 25 June 2025 5:42:37 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Obviously the South,
And does that mean I'm glad not to be born in the North, probably.
But that's their life and that's their world.
I could say to Kim Jung Un:
"You could be doing this and you could be doing that..."
I could say "You could be doing better for your people"
- But it's not my place to impose

And as I've said to you a long time ago,
The countries, targets of the Wests fifth columns who are willing to play the long game and sow discontent for regime change, well those countries leaders don't have the room to offer such freedoms when the West will use such measures as a way to topple the nations leaders, put in their own puppet rulers
And then manage the country in a way not in the peoples interests
But in a way that benefits a foreign power or big business.

Like lets say a large billion dollar multinational has eyes on a certain countries mineral wealth.
It's nothing for them to give a large donation to a think tank who will then devise a strategy to topple the countries leadership, and firstly promote the strategy to politicians and then when it all goes down everyone gets a piece of the pie, MIC included.
But the people living there have their nations wealth taken for the interests of a foreign government and big business.

How many times did the U.S talk about it's 'national interests' when the country involved was on the other side of the globe, and not a threat to the U.S. in any way.
Posted by Armchair Critic, Wednesday, 25 June 2025 7:06:24 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
That is an old Soviet narrative, AC. When I look at threats to Australia, top of the list is the idiocy of net zero. Granted, there might be CCP influence because that is where the solar panels and windmills come from, and with billions being tossed about like confetti there is lots of commercial lobbying, but the main architects are democratically elected.

Similarly, I think that people living in s'hole countries might attribute their quality of life to their authoritarian rulers rather than Great Satan America or the Elders of Zion.
Posted by Fester, Wednesday, 25 June 2025 9:52:18 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I told you all years back regime changes are funded by USAID and run by the NED (National Endowment for Democracy)
In any case the Iranian FM announced a week prior to the strikes they were moving centrifuges and enriched uranium.
There were no increased levels of uranium, because there was nothing there, but also the strikes themselves were ineffective.
Posted by Armchair Critic, Thursday, 26 June 2025 7:56:49 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
[Cont.]

“This is the mother of all wars and should only end on the terms of unconditional surrender by the regime in Iran,” Havakuk, 37, says.
Would he support Israel trying to assassinate the Supreme Leader of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei? “Of course,” he replies.<<

On the other hand...

>>As he waits on the street to be allowed back into his home to survey the damage from the missile strike, Beersheba resident Meir Nahamani is still in shock from that morning’s attack. “I never thought this could happen right next to my home,” he says.

He argues that Israeli strikes on Iran were encouraging retaliation and increasing the danger for Israeli civilians. Facing the task of rebuilding a bombed-out home, he says it is time for the fighting to end and life in Israel to return to something resembling normal. He has learnt firsthand the damage Iranian missiles can cause. “This is a different animal to what we are used to with Hamas,” he says. “This is a more serious enemy.”<<

So Israel spends 18mths flattening Gaza killing tens of thousands of civillians, if not more, while the world looks on in horror, but suddenly after 12 days of the same treatment, they're screaming 'PLEASE STOP!!'

12 days?
(And Israel was already running out of missile interceptors)
The mother of all wars?

Cry me a fecking river...

Reap what you've sown...
Posted by Armchair Critic, Thursday, 26 June 2025 8:28:44 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 18
  7. 19
  8. 20
  9. Page 21
  10. 22
  11. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy