The Forum > General Discussion > Albanese A Goner in 2025?
Albanese A Goner in 2025?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- ...
- 42
- 43
- 44
-
- All
Posted by Armchair Critic, Friday, 6 December 2024 4:56:58 PM
| |
Sky News is owned by News Corp.
Rupert Murdoch: Israel’s Most Powerful Supporter http://www.mintpressnews.com/rupert-murdoch-israel-most-powerful-weapon/287794/ Maybe Sky News should register as a foreign agent too? Posted by Armchair Critic, Friday, 6 December 2024 5:27:28 PM
| |
I've been here for what a decade now..
For all the things I say and criticise Do any of you think I've ever deliberately lied about anything, ever? I argue on a basis of merit, that's all. Tell me would you all fight for my free speech, but then deny me the right to use it? Posted by Armchair Critic, Friday, 6 December 2024 5:36:19 PM
| |
Your right to vote is free speech.
No where is the right to regurgitate misinformation. If you deliberately print misinformation that is liable. An opinion is just that but must be stipulated. Sky news has no disclaimers as to authenticity of substance. Carriers of misinformation for further publication are as bad as the original author. Discussions that are true are much better than discussions that only contain half truths. misinformation and half truth's is what courts are for to untangle the truth. This is my opinion. Posted by doog, Friday, 6 December 2024 6:52:59 PM
| |
Albanese A Goner in 2025?
Certainly should Be ! Posted by Indyvidual, Friday, 6 December 2024 7:15:30 PM
| |
Hi doog,
'No where is the right to regurgitate misinformation.' A large majority of parents lie to their kids about Santa every year. You can find him in every shopping center. Is Santa misinformation or disinformation. Should we option a/ fine all parents or option b/ ban Santa Claus? Is the government going to fine Myers and Westfield? What about UFO documentaries on Netflix misinfo, or disinfo? I could go on and on... Is some misinfo and disinfo tolerated Or is there some special imaginary line that we're all supposed to understand? Can you provide examples on what is ok, and what is not? Not trying to be difficult, but it's a minefield Just another one of those things they wish to beat people over the head with. I just argue on merit. Do you think this feller Santa actually climbs down a billion chimneys in a single night and has flying reindeer? http://www.westfield.com.au/mtgravatt/news/6RJqz1pXV2b3AZdneSMxNG/westfield-santa-photography-booking If I saw I saw bigfoot yesterday eating a kangaroo in my backyard, (that's is a lie btw - openly stated) what does it matter? There's 25 million people in this country and none of us agrees on anything, surely all the different things different people say all can't be right at the same time. Are we then all not all purveyors of misinfo and disinfo? And finally since when was it against the law to lie? I'm not under oath here... In my private life, especially with younger people, I lie and make stuff up all the time, For one, it's funny and everyone ends up cacking themselves laughing and for two; I want them to learn how to smell bs so they aren't taken in by liars who really do seek to exploit them. Posted by Armchair Critic, Friday, 6 December 2024 7:18:54 PM
|
Or do conservatives influence the way Sky News thinks and presents itself?
Is Sky News really representative of conservatives or is the tail wagging the dog?