[Cont]
If you think Josephus has broken the forum rules you are free to report him
- Just like I just reported you.

For consistently telling other people what they should think and what they should say,
- And when they can and can't post as you did to me on the other thread.

You think Putin's a dictator,
But take a look in the mirror you're not so different yourself.

Dear Armchair Critic,

You did what? Reported Foxy? For what? For telling someone to stop posting crap?

Well yes I suppose I do see why you might get a little triggered by that, but still, we usually let you go on and on principally because you don't come across as a racist little prig like Josephus does.

Your stuff is relatively harmless, Josephus is regurgitating racist and fascist tropes and they really should be left to lie on the table garnering implied consensus where there is none.

Now calm the farm old boy and be at peace when the nasty types get a clip around the ears every so often. They are manifestly deserving of it.

*shouldn't

Steele, Nothing I have stated has not been stated by Albanese or his Voice committee, the ABC or SBS. If you cannot accept the words I write, you are not blighting me you must take it up with the people I quote. It shows evidence you do not listen to or read what they say.

The Question time today Labor members were quoting health and education short falls by specific cases, since they already know these problems, it is their responsibility to do something about it. A Voice will do no more than what they are doing after hearing from communities and not acting on it. Albanese is an inept leader to deal with the problems they hear about, it is all a smoke screen. He was in Arnhem last week and heard the situation and wants the Voice to Act, when he knows the problems without a Voice.

Dear Steele,

Armchair Critic needs to go back and read my posts
to Josephus. Perhaps with time, he just may
understand what I did say - not what he thinks I
said. Although I won't hold my breath.
He unfortunately has this problem in other
interpretations of important issues.

That's why I've decided from now on stop reading
what he posts. I should do the same for Josephus.
But the Voice is to important an issue - to allow
misinformation and fear-mongering to continue to
be spread.

Hi SteeleRedux,
Foxy, like everyone else here is entitled to her opinion.
She's well within her rights to say:
'Josephus, I think your opinion's crap and I also think you're crap'

But she doesn't have the right to try to limit Josephus' speech in any way.
If Josephus posts something that's a breach of forum rules she can report him and let the REAL forum moderator decide.
Over the past few months she's directed this kind of finger-waving attitude and behavior at me numerous times,
often telling me that I have no credibility, when what she should be saying is 'I don't think your statements are credible'
- It's not for her to decide for the entire group.

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=10168#349151
"We should not be giving a pro Putin supporter a
platform to continue to spout Putin's propaganda."

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=10168#349870
"Start your own discussion stop trying to divert mine!
Za-mohl-chee!"
['Shut up' in Russian]

She said to Josephus:
"Please don't deal with hypotheticals - and what may or may not happen in the future."
"Stop your attempts at fear-mongering. It's most unbecoming. Deal with facts not conjectures and your own personal biases."

[Speaking of personal biases, she most certainly was attempting to impose her own personal biases in attempting to limit my opinion.]

She's not the forum police officer.
She doesn't get to try to coerce others to only say things she approves of.
- And she doesn't get to try to influence others to try to isolate a person from having their opinion.

Why is it that so-called 'liberals' are often the most authoritarian?
Does she think that she's above others, more intelligent, and that she has a duty to stifle opinions she doesn't agree with?
- Well she may think that, but it's not all about her, she doesn't have any right to limit anyone else's opinions
Do we need to seek her approval before commenting?
If she wants to wave the finger at others;
Maybe the actual forum moderator should wave their finger at her.

And at least I owned what I did, I didn't hide from it.