The Forum > General Discussion > Finally Clarity The Voice Referendum Question
Finally Clarity The Voice Referendum Question
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Page 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
-
- All
Posted by Indyvidual, Tuesday, 11 April 2023 12:34:55 PM
| |
BAD DAY FOR DUTTZ TODAY:
"Shadow Attorney-General and Indigenous Australians spokesman Julian Leeser has quit the Liberal frontbench, making way for him to campaign for an Indigenous Voice to Parliament. [AND CONFUSINGLY - DUTTON'S] position is for recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders in the constitution but not a Voice to Parliament. It supports regional and local voices but doesn't want them enshrined in the constitution." GO FIGURE. MORE SEE: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-11/liberal-frontbencher-julian-leeser-voice-to-parliament/102207614 Posted by Maverick, Tuesday, 11 April 2023 12:51:12 PM
| |
But we are all Australians.
Should we then not all be acknowledged in the Constitution? Why introduce race-based wording for a few? And what real advantage is the suggested 'acknowledgement'? Relieving hurt feelings? My suggestion for that is: 'it is time to grow up'. And stop being a 'wuss' too. There are far more important things in life. Australia needs positive thought. Australia needs positive contributions. Australia needs YOU to pull your socks up. You are starting to look like an untidy rabble. Step forward (boldly?), and keep Australia level and progressive. Posted by Ipso Fatso, Tuesday, 11 April 2023 8:11:39 PM
| |
And regarding Mr Julian...
It appears he only likes democracy when it agrees with him. He forgets he will not always be on the 'winning' side. However, a democratic decision IS the best way to go. Without all the drama, he could simply have voted against the party. Or quietly abstained. That is his right, on behalf of his electorate. But he would need to explain to his electorate why he voted that way? Posted by Ipso Fatso, Tuesday, 11 April 2023 8:25:17 PM
| |
Hi Mavs,
You mentioned Dutton's position. Is there any truth to the rumour that The Dud will be shooting off to the good old US of A shortly, to get advice on the Voice from Dangerous Doctor Donald. Whilst there The Dud will be assuming the Stormy Daniels position with Donald for a intensive all night session. Is it true? Cause The Dud has taken every other position on the Voice thus far, why not the Stormy Daniels position. Posted by Paul1405, Tuesday, 11 April 2023 9:07:06 PM
| |
The VOICE is not a moral question, it's a political & power based & focussed issue.
Morally, Australians have already bent ar$e over backwards in aid of it's indigenous. The desired power grab & political opportunism are not a moral issue. Posted by Indyvidual, Tuesday, 11 April 2023 9:16:33 PM
|
The rest has already been addressed for many decades & by Billions in funding of facilities & services !