that all 1.9 billion Muslims in the world, are terrorists, or the supporters of terrorists,
Paul1405,
Majority acquiescence does not reflect all !

Indy,

"Majority acquiescence does not reflect all!"

What you are saying is the majority of Muslims say nothing when it comes to acts of terrorism, therefore you assume they must be supporters. That is false, the mainstream Muslim leadership have gone to great lengths to publicly condemn terrorism. The ordinary have no public voice, so clams of silence does indicates support is fallacious on your part.

You could make the same false assumption about paedophilia in the Catholic Church, the majority of Catholics have not condemned church paedophilia publicly, as they have no means to do so, so therefore they must be supporters. What rubbish!

Paul1405,
The same goes for the Catholics & indeed all who watch but make an effort to stop these practices.
Just as it goes for those bureaucrats on over-generous public salaries who let people down on a daily basis.
That lady in Byron Bay facing deportation is a fine example of the system you're so defensive & proud of !

Indy,

The law should always be tempered with justice. From what I've read about the English woman Belinda Checkley's case she should be allowed to stay in Australia permanently, I have no problem with that, so what's your point?

BTW; We let you in, so that set the bar rather low, did it not? At least this woman has not played the welfare system from the day she arrived, not like some!

Pauliar,

You posted that China had no poverty. Were you lying again or just stupid?

Are you claiming that Indians are more like the Chinese than the Taiwanese?

What about the 50 000 000 that the CCP killed, does that matter to you?

What about the economic hole that the CCP has driven China into now?

shonky,

The World Bank figure for the level of poverty in China was given as 0.0%, that's where that came from, and at the time of posting I said so. So that answers that question.

NOW! You said 'macrotrends' was a very reliable site with honest information, and they put the level of poverty in China at 24.7%, you posted that. Researching the same website I found they put the level of poverty for India at 83.8%. WE have discussed India/China before so PLEASE EXPLAIN why under rampant Capitalism the Indian poverty level is 83.8%, after 75 years of independence from the murderous British tyrants.

One who wont answer a question because he has been caught out; weasel, skunk, toad, you can add a few more for yourself.