Pauliar,

Again, you lie! Where did I say "India has a superior economic outcome in regards to poverty than China"?

Taiwan is a better comparison than India because it has the same people with the same background starting at the same time. This time your head is in the noose.

India presently has a better growth rate than China.

shonky,

Of course the Chinese Provence of Taiwan with its small population and area, coupled with massive American investment has a superior per capita economy than mainland China. Taiwan is an American propaganda show piece, claiming there is a superiority of capitalism over communism, and the Taiwanese have benefited from that. India has had no such luck, and is an economic basket case with 1.1 billion poverty stricken.

You wanting to make comparisons between Taiwan and mainland China, is like you sighting the economic superiority of people living in the Sydney suburb of Vaucluse with those living in Mount Druitt. Chalk and Cheese.

Pauliar,

Firstly, Taiwan has a population of twenty-five million people, most descendants of those that fled from CCP oppression. The island had been occupied by the Japanese and was nothing like Vaucluse.

The "massive" aid you are talking about was $1.4bn over 14 years (something that Albozo blows on a weekend) primarily military aid to fight off the PLA and a small portion to help with infrastructure.

While the Taiwanese were encouraging foreign investment the CCP was shooting the educated and starving its people. The reality is that Taiwan got a 20-year head start.

The comparison between China and India that you brought up to deflect from the more relevant comparison with Taiwan.