The Forum > Article Comments > Changing Australia Day > Comments
Changing Australia Day : Comments
By Andrew Bartlett, published 28/1/2009Calls to change Australia Day are manna from heaven for radio shock jocks and history warriors: it’s no surprise Kevin Rudd wants to shut down debate.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Page 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- ...
- 16
- 17
- 18
-
- All
It seems to me that the epitome of culture and civilisation is to direct one's criticisms and hostility to different ideas, opinions and expressions rather than to their authors.
By the same token, courtesy and respect are attributes of cultured and civilised people. Nevertheless, notions such as courtesy and respect are totally irrelevant so far as ideas, opinions and expressions are concerned.
In a civilizsed world, the fact that one detests or even hates somebody's ideas, opinions and/or expressions does not imply that one should necessarily detest or hate the author of such ideas, opinions and/or expressions.
In my humble opinion, it would be an over-simplification to classify indigenous Australians' social organisation as primitive and that of non-indigenous Australians' as civilised. In many respects, the aborigines are less inclined to live a solitary existence than non-indigenous Australians. Perhaps it is due to the rudeness of their existence, but they appear to be more willing to exchange individual freedom for the security of uniform legal restrictions.
Rightly or wrongly, the principal distinction appears to me to be not so much of a cultural or civilisational nature but more the result of a lack of communication through geographical isolation for thousands of years having prevented the aborigines benefiting from the knowledge development of other communities around the world.