The Forum > Article Comments > Is multiculturalism really 'mushy'? > Comments
Is multiculturalism really 'mushy'? : Comments
By Jieh-Yung Lo, published 27/2/2007Multiculturalism may be abandoned as a policy but it continues to live on as a value.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Page 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- ...
- 33
- 34
- 35
-
- All
Horus, you distort my argument. I said that successive governments - Coalition and ALP alike - legitimated Multiculturalism. The counter-argument came: the people didn't have a say in that because there was no referendum. I countered that by saying that referenda are rare; overwhelmingly, governments introduce policy without referenda because they think they are acting in the national interest. If enough people they're wrong, they can vote them out at election-time. That hasn't happened. It's reasonable to conclude that only a minority of Australians oppose Multiculturalism.
Oligarch, you accuse me of 'unfounded, dogmatic certitude'. And you do it with 'unfounded dogmatic certitude'. But I'm not your prime target. You call Jieh-Yung Lo a 'multicultural industry beneficiary' and berate him for having the 'audacity to lecture Australians'. Wouldn't you feel better if you dealt with his ideas rather than name-calling and mud-slinging?
Horus, having no counter to my substantive arguments, you resort to unconfirmed anecdote. You produce four workplace stories as if they typify Multiculturalism. They sound like examples of poor management and inadequate workplace relations to me. They are no more symptomatic of Multiculturalism than Banjo's 'poligomy, dog meat and dolphins, whales being consumed, FGM common place, cockfights and bullfights held every Saturday, firearms carried openly in public'.
As aqvarivs says, today of all days: 'Oh, Man. There's nuttin like a good joke.'