Hi Tnaveer,

Veil ... A Fridge to keep the meat

..

Woman compared to a kilo of meat

If you take a kilo of meat, and you don't put it in the fridge or in the pot or in the kitchen but you leave it on a plate in the backyard, and then you have a fight with the neighbour because his cats eat the meat, you're crazy. Isn't this true?

"If you take uncovered meat and put it on the street, on the pavement, in a garden, in a park or in the backyard, without a cover and the cats eat it, is it the fault of the cat or the uncovered meat? The uncovered meat is the problem.

"If the meat was covered, the cats wouldn't roam around it. If the meat is inside the fridge, they won't get it.

"If the meat was in the fridge and it (the cat) smelled it, it can bang its head as much as it wants, but it's no use.

"If the woman is in her boudoir, in her house and if she's wearing the veil and if she shows modesty, disasters don't happen.

So, women are meat and "WE" (males) have to keep them in Fridges. Fridges refer to Hijabs/Jijabs/Kababs etc..

Tanveer, do you agree?

'They are here to further their children's education in order to give them a better chance in life as well as send money back home to help their extended families. Their purposes are economic and educational.'

Perhaps if their cultures were not so obsessed with saving face and shame and focused on more productive things then their home countries wouldn't be such third world toilets and they wouldn't feel compelled to raise their kids in such decadent lands such as ours.

I've worked with these lunatics for years, they would argue for friggin ages over a six dollar ticket in order to save face, even if it meant getting a hefty fine in the process. All that mattered was that they saved face in front of the inbreds that made up their extended famlilies. They are reflections of the culture of their home countries.

Just the veil? Their whole religion...sorry I meant CULT has to be abolished in Australia. Nothing less is good enough.

The Sheik as he left the Mosque today in Sydney commented he would remain in power until the White House was erased. He does not see his rival as a religious leader like the Pope or the Arch Bishop of Sydney, but as the President of the USA a leader of a rival political power.

These people are not teaching personal development and moral qualities of purity. These people are being taught by the Sheik an agenda of subversion of Western Culture and values. They are political animals who want to destroy Western Culture and bring about primitive Eastern Culture on every Nation on Earth. They are about the controll of people, and not about empowering people in their personal life. They teach our freedoms and personal choices are the destruction of civilisation.

Lakemba Mosque is the seat of a political movement, not the training centre for betterment of one's personal life. They teach our system of Government is corrupt because it allows diversity of personal belief and religion.

LET US REMOVE THE VEIL FROM OUR EYES.

It is interesting that it took the efforts of a journalist from the Australian Newspaper to uncover this poor excuse for humanity,Sheik Halili.What were ASIO and our Federal Police doing about exposing this creep when he is doing more damage than any explosion?

You get the feeling that our Govts don't want to know about a problem in which they were instrumental in creating.It seems to be all in the too hard basket.Be assured that there are are many more like him.You only have to walk the streets of some Sydney suburbs only to be spat at or experience some lurid remark.

We have an appeasing mentality of not offending the Muslims for fear that they might become violent and upset our comfort zones.Appeasement means submission,and the religious facists will win,if we don't have the courage and will to take them to task.

Johnj.
A trillions thanks. But for your considered and thoughtful note, NOT ONE post to this thread would have directly adressed the issues Tanveer Ahmed was raising.
As one old enough to remember the last few waves of immigration to Australia, I'd have to say that even the British isles migrants of the fifties and sixties had trouble fitting in here. Heaps of them having difficulty fitting in turned around and headed back "home", with the epiteth "whingeing pom" whistling venomously past their ears.
People from older, more agrarian-based "traditional" cultures from Greece , the Balkans, Italy and so forth, often exhibited even stronger responses to the "culture shock" of being in a western consumerist culture after leaving war-torn Europe.
Thinking on it, I think even my Sydney born mother suffered a dose of something akin to this "culture shock", coming to a dusty outer suburb hundreds of miles from her old extended family and friends, and this contributed to my parents' marriage eventually breaking up.
Why should it be any easier for current waves of migrants to "fit in", especially this current lot, especially when they are subject to the monotonous scapegoating,for sheappolitical ends, of recent years. The ghettoising is reinforced by responses like last week whipped up up by the scab repulsive "Australian" newspaper. The other normal homesickness pressures are probably tough enough for strangers in a new world, without a mongrel press and media and a government whose expertise as to dog whistling makes Sheik Hillelly, in the spotlight currently, seem by comparison a scared amateur, as to his clumsy appeals to his home constituency.
And the usual pack of howling, illiterate hicks buys it everytime, as if the place was Alabama or 'thirties Germany; looking for the jews.!