The Forum > Article Comments > The 'Israeli take' > Comments
The 'Israeli take' : Comments
By Colin Andersen, published 28/7/2006To get a more nuanced understanding of events in the Middle East, one has to turn to the Internet.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Page 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
-
- All
Posted by The alchemist, Tuesday, 1 August 2006 11:20:58 AM
| |
What did John Howard say?
That there would be no peace in the Middle East until the Arabs excepted Israel. Hmm, sounds like words of war to me. The world is being run by idiots. Posted by Spider, Tuesday, 1 August 2006 12:37:00 PM
| |
Mango,
A few years back when I was running The Aust. Satanic Council, a group of researchers looked into the "Protocols" and other works and it was clear that these were obviously fabricated. As a result they were not published in any council works. It would be unwise to rely on them. Scout, Despite a 48-Hour cease file (at least aerially), Hezbollah continued to launch rocket attacks. Isreal recommenced bombing. Hezbollah have no interest in the safety of any civilians on either side of the border. It is also unlikely that a prisoner exchange is viable. The two Israeli soldiers are more than likely dead, having been decapitated with a butter knife as is the Shia custom. Posted by Narcissist, Tuesday, 1 August 2006 1:43:18 PM
| |
Israel was not secure before, that is the singularly most important point. They left Lebanon, they left Gaza. The rocket barrages and strikes increased, rather than decreasing. The moral of the story, whether Israel attempts to create peace is irrelevant, until her neighbours are ready to use dialogue, rather than rockets, there is no prospect of peace in the Middle East, and Israel must continue to fight, as running away is not an option.
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3283344,00.html Peace can not be imposed unilaterally, especially when the enemy refuses to accept it. Interestingly, one of the major sticking points in the negotiations has been Hizbollah's refusal to accept Sheba'a/Shaba farms (Ha'ar Dov) as it would then have no reason to exist. It is also noticeable that many in Lebanon now blame Hizbollah for the violence, and for the 'massacres' which massacres appear to be Hizbollah's raison de etre: http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3284514,00.html Hopefully at the end of this round of fighting, Lebanon will be emptied of Hizbollah & its supporters. Then, finally, it can rebuild in peace and safety. Inshallah 2bob Posted by 2bob, Tuesday, 1 August 2006 3:06:05 PM
| |
2bob, you can't just 'rid' a country of a political movement (which is what hizbollah is in addition to being a terrorist group) by bombing the crap out of them. Most analysts have suggested that hizbollahs support has increased since the start of the latest hostilities.
Start thinking about the reality of the situation, do you think you could just rid this country of, for example, the Democrats? of course not, the ideas that group stands for must first become irrelevant (which they nearly have, hence their downfall) If Israel continues to throw its weight around the ideas of hizbollah will continue to find resonance amongst the people in South Lebanon Posted by Carl, Tuesday, 1 August 2006 3:29:22 PM
| |
Carl,
What ever happened to One Nation? Seems to me you can get rid of a political movement. 2Bob is stating what is glaringly obvious to anyone with any sense. Israel has been attacked and is defending itself. Hezbollah/Iran are using the Lebanese people as human shields. Hezbollah is also attacking the Lebanese people and blaming it on Isreal. The problem is that Isreal is not very good at manipulating the world's media. Unlike America, it is failing to embed journalist with its troops and arguing its case with daily media briefings. Perhaps it is to protect Mosad agents in the field that it neglects sharing its intelligence. On the other hand, Hezbollah are playing the media. Still, despite Hezbollah's media savvy, huge holes appear in their propaganda war. Posted by Narcissist, Tuesday, 1 August 2006 3:38:55 PM
|
Its pleasing seeing those following god, exhibiting their true disposition, in their demand to be right. A protocol statement,
“Our right lies in force. The word "right" is an abstract thought and proved by nothing. The word means no more than: “Give me what I want in order that thereby I may have a proof that I am stronger than you. “
You see glaring examples of this empty headed fantasy from the rabid warmongers of boaz, 2 bob and their ilk. If their support for evil barbarity wasn't so deadly, you'd laugh at how gullible they are in being cannon fodder for the elite of the world. As they say, give a fool a lie and they'll go with it until their death, whilst the provider of the lie, feeds on the fruits of the lies results.
The biggest lie, is "god is love", fully borne out by monotheistic expression on this planet. The fools century after century support this lie with violence, to their detriment and many others. Those behind supporting the lie with more lies, gain generation after generation until they have their control. You see this in privatisation, globalisation, total control by less than ten companies. Oil, costs $6-$10 barrel to produce, sells for $75, reason, lies. Who controls the oil companies, Monsanto, haliburtion etc., zionists
In Iraq, the economic control is in the hands of zionist and christian controlled companies. The government's just an expendable side show whilst the real work of take over goes on. The same for Lebanon, this invasions been planned for years. only idiots wouldn't seen that. But if your understanding comes from theology, your easy fooled, as displayed by gods puppets on this forum.