The Forum > Article Comments > Pregnancy is not a disease > Comments
Pregnancy is not a disease : Comments
By Melinda Tankard Reist, published 24/7/2006Women are going to be 'treated' for pregancy using an anti-cancer drug to induce an abortion.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Page 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- ...
- 39
- 40
- 41
-
- All
The original article was about the use of chemicals to induce a termination of a pregnancy.
"Canadian scientist Dr Ed Napke has observed: “One must remember that chemical surgery, namely exposing the body to chemical products, is more intrusive than physical surgery.”
Then there are the emotional effects. Some studies report chemical abortion as more psychologically harrowing. Significant numbers of women report the anxiety caused by the long wait for the pregnancy to pass too difficult and that the bleeding was 'emotionally difficult to see'."
I merely stated an observation that some tribes had used in the past herbal remedies to end a pregnancy. In response to the above section of the article.
At no point did the article discuss either, live exports or intensive farming.
"You have no such compashion for the cries from the unbeleibale cruelty of live exports and intensive farming."(sic) Wendy Lewthwaite
Nor did the article discuss the abuse of children by members of the clergy (including nuns).
Again I will reiterate labelling a person whose post you disagree with "a rapists or a child abuser" is really offensive and abusive!
This is not an uncommon tactic used primarily to try and take the high moral ground and to play the victim