The Forum > Article Comments > Defining David Hicks > Comments
Defining David Hicks : Comments
By Neil James, published 9/6/2006Releasing David Hicks is not as easy and straightforward as it seems.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Page 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- ...
- 22
- 23
- 24
-
- All
This is a new kind of conflict in which almost anybody can be labelled a terrorist simply by being in the wrong place at the wrong time, especially "other" foreigners.
I don't know whether David set out defend the Taliban from the invaders or had for that matter, had any understanding he had otherwise placed himself in harms way or beyond the pale.
Neils's comment that "the plight of former genuine PoW is demeaned by those seeking to free Hicks at all costs and without sufficient thought as to the consequences" seems unfair and possibly suggests that international law should now be properly amended to deal with Mr Hicks unique status. Otherwise POW's in future conflicts may fall victim to some de-facto precedent which is now being established.
If the absence of legal status cannot be determined here as is strongly implied by Neil's article then it would be hard to find a better reason and justification for the writ of habeous corpus to be applied