The Forum > Article Comments > Adept at puerile politics > Comments
Adept at puerile politics : Comments
By Ted Lapkin, published 21/2/2006The timing, scope and focus of the Danish cartoon controversy raises suspicions this crisis owes much to cynical manipulation.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Page 11
- 12
-
- All
Sounds you don't understand commas and inverted commas as well.
Reason why I didn't comment on your stats were as follows:
- You are commenting on nationalities birth rate and not religions (North & West Africans are Christians and Muslims).
For example 3 decades ago Nigeria had majority Muslims now they are almost 50/50 split Muslims/ Christians. Please explain!
- You are ignoring death rates in African countries and life expectancy. Nothing personal but you are always a one sided person in your comments.
- Coming back to Australian statistics: if you don't understand how to analyse numbers then talk to an analyst or just don't talk numbers. Put simply, if the majority of a country is follow religion A, the Higest migration intake in religion A (B, C, D kept at minimum), the highest growth is in religion B over 5 years period (birth rates are irrelevant in 5 years). then the trend in high growth is religion B (not A, C or D).
- When you claim numbers you need to compare to something: I asked you for a comparison of number of kids per household (Muslims/ Catholics/ Jews / Buddhist for example. Then you can have an unemotional analysis of demography and growth.
Sorry go and study maths or statistics before you get into a topic.